http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/07/national/main1596114.shtml
WTF?
Quote from: ZeroX on May 09, 2006, 12:25:30 PM
WTF?
OK, there's a reason that most of us don't like this kind of piss-poor commentary. We don't know if you're saying "WTF" at the fact that he's on the most-wanted list, WTF at the fact that he's a multiple-rapist, WTF at the fact that he's a polygamist, or anything else.
Assuming the first:
QuoteHe is wanted in Arizona on criminal charges of sexual conduct with a minor. He also was charged in Utah with rape as an accomplice.
It's actually multiple criminal charges of sexual conduct with a minor in Arizona. I heard a press conference on the radio yesterday where one of the guy's nephews spoke up about how he (Jeffs) molested him and several of his brothers when they were younger, leading to one of the brothers' suicides.
Cults are scary.
I've seen documentaries on those Mormon branch offs that are their own super secret communities where EVERYONE is apart of their cult. No one else is allowed in a such, scary. Terrorists come from those places too.
Quote from: MyndFyrex86] link=topic=5821.msg68720#msg68720 date=1147193342]
Quote from: ZeroX on May 09, 2006, 12:25:30 PM
WTF?
OK, there's a reason that most of us don't like this kind of piss-poor commentary. We don't know if you're saying "WTF" at the fact that he's on the most-wanted list, WTF at the fact that he's a multiple-rapist, WTF at the fact that he's a polygamist, or anything else.
I am saying WTF to why he is on the FBI most wanted list. I mean come on a child rapist? Damn Califorina is filled with them. I think the FBI should be dealing with Terrorists before they start an investigation on a nut job.
I think its because he is a serial child rapist...which = bad
QuoteJeffs, 50, is accused of arranging marriages between underage girls and older men.
I didn't know LDS allowed homosexuality. Of course, it looked like he'd created his own branch of Mormonism, which as we've seen with the Westburrow Baptist Church, doesn't mean they are closely affiliated with the beliefs of who they've branched off of.
Homosexuality?...........where did you get that?
Old man + little girl = eww, but not homoism
Quote from: MyndFyrex86] link=topic=5821.msg68720#msg68720 date=1147193342]
Quote from: ZeroX on May 09, 2006, 12:25:30 PM
WTF?
OK, there's a reason that most of us don't like this kind of piss-poor commentary. We don't know if you're saying "WTF" at the fact that he's on the most-wanted list, WTF at the fact that he's a multiple-rapist, WTF at the fact that he's a polygamist, or anything else.
Assuming the first:
QuoteHe is wanted in Arizona on criminal charges of sexual conduct with a minor. He also was charged in Utah with rape as an accomplice.
It's actually multiple criminal charges of sexual conduct with a minor in Arizona. I heard a press conference on the radio yesterday where one of the guy's nephews spoke up about how he (Jeffs) molested him and several of his brothers when they were younger, leading to one of the brothers' suicides.
Quote from: CrAz3D on May 09, 2006, 05:36:18 PM
Homosexuality?...........where did you get that?
Old man + little girl = eww, but not homoism
Read the quote again:
QuoteJeffs, 50, is accused of arranging marriages between underage girls and older men.
rabbit's quote says it. eww, wtf kind of church dude is this?
But Sidoh, doesn't that quote you're pointing at just say Jeffs was getting underage girl and older men together? Like girl + man?
Quote from: CrAz3D on May 09, 2006, 06:18:05 PM
rabbit's quote says it. eww, wtf kind of church dude is this?
But Sidoh, doesn't that quote you're pointing at just say Jeffs was getting underage girl and older men together? Like girl + man?
Oh, yeah. I was taking it this way: he married young girls and older men. :P
Quote from: Sidoh on May 09, 2006, 06:30:43 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on May 09, 2006, 06:18:05 PM
rabbit's quote says it. eww, wtf kind of church dude is this?
But Sidoh, doesn't that quote you're pointing at just say Jeffs was getting underage girl and older men together? Like girl + man?
Oh, yeah. I was taking it this way: he married young girls and older men. :P
oh,k, I was just trying to make sure
I wasn't reading it wrong ;)
Quote from: CrAz3D on May 09, 2006, 06:37:43 PM
oh,k, I was just trying to make sure I wasn't reading it wrong ;)
har har har.
Quote from: Sidoh on May 09, 2006, 06:30:43 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on May 09, 2006, 06:18:05 PM
rabbit's quote says it. eww, wtf kind of church dude is this?
But Sidoh, doesn't that quote you're pointing at just say Jeffs was getting underage girl and older men together? Like girl + man?
Oh, yeah. I was taking it this way: he married young girls and older men. :P
Dumbass.
Quote from: MyndFyrex86] link=topic=5821.msg68764#msg68764 date=1147218171]
Dumbass.
That was uncalled for, but whatever.
I'm sure that you've never misread something, seeing as you a flawless being.
Quote from: ZeroX on May 09, 2006, 05:05:01 PM
I am saying WTF to why he is on the FBI most wanted list. I mean come on a child rapist? Damn Califorina is filled with them. I think the FBI should be dealing with Terrorists before they start an investigation on a nut job.
I'm pretty sure that a child rapist does more damage than a terrorist.
Quote from: Sidoh on May 09, 2006, 07:59:07 PM
Quote from: MyndFyrex86] link=topic=5821.msg68764#msg68764 date=1147218171]
Dumbass.
That was uncalled for, but whatever.
I'm sure that you've never misread something, seeing as you a flawless being.
Damn right.
Actually I just forgot a :P. :P
Quote from: iago on May 09, 2006, 08:09:59 PM
I'm pretty sure that a child rapist does more damage than a terrorist.
I'm pretty sure that's entirely subjective.
Quote from: MyndFyrex86] link=topic=5821.msg68784#msg68784 date=1147221799]
Quote from: iago on May 09, 2006, 08:09:59 PM
I'm pretty sure that a child rapist does more damage than a terrorist.
I'm pretty sure that's entirely subjective.
Take the number of people killed or injured by terrorists, divided by the number of terrorists.
Take the number of people killed or injured by child rapists, divided by the number of child rapists.
I suspect that child rapists would win. I'm more worried about them, personally.
Terrorist:
Alot of people per 1 dude
Child raper:
A couple kids per 1 raper
Terrorists win, no?
Quote from: CrAz3D on May 09, 2006, 09:34:10 PM
Terrorist:
Alot of people per 1 dude
Child raper:
A couple kids per 1 raper
That's the approach I was taking. On an individual basis, terrorists get a lot more people (typically).
Quote from: CrAz3D on May 09, 2006, 09:34:10 PM
Terrorist:
Alot of people per 1 dude
Child raper:
A couple kids per 1 raper
Terrorists win, no?
But the vast majority of terrorists don't hurt anybody.
Quote from: iago on May 09, 2006, 09:42:09 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on May 09, 2006, 09:34:10 PM
Terrorist:
Alot of people per 1 dude
Child raper:
A couple kids per 1 raper
Terrorists win, no?
But the vast majority of terrorists don't hurt anybody.
Because they're in trainning...
If there was a terrorist that didn't terrorize or expect to terroize anyone then he wouldn't be classified as a terrorist
(http://hereisnewyork.org/jpegs/photos/2087.jpg)
I have little doubt that the terrorists would win.
Signed @ Sidoh.
Quote from: Sidoh on May 09, 2006, 09:56:34 PM
(http://hereisnewyork.org/jpegs/photos/2087.jpg)
I have little doubt that the terrorists would win.
Well!
http://www.ytmnd.com/list/?search=brian+peppers
;) (Yes, I know he isn't REALLY a child rapist/whatever)
http://pepperstruth.ytmnd.com/
>.>
Quote from: Sidoh on May 09, 2006, 09:56:34 PM
(http://hereisnewyork.org/jpegs/photos/2087.jpg)
I have little doubt that the terrorists would win.
Why? 9/11 only killed 3000 people, and that was set up by at least 4, but probably over a dozen terrorists. that's less than 500 kills for those terrorists, compared to the 0 kills for almost everybody else who supported 9/11..
Terrorists aren't the worst problem in America. Neither were Communists or Witches. Scapegoats aren't the answer.
Not everyone that supported 9/11 was a terrorist, they're just fucked up people.
Incidentally, what worries you more:
a) Some guy walking down the street thinking about raping your little sister (or daughter)
b) Some guy in the middle-east trying to cause terror
I guess that choice is rather a personal decision...
Quote from: iago on May 10, 2006, 01:29:19 PM
Incidentally, what worries you more:
a) Some guy walking down the street thinking about raping your little sister (or daughter)
b) Some guy in the middle-east trying to cause terror
I guess that choice is rather a personal decision...
That's an incredibly subjective question! If you live in the middle of the ghetto, of course you're going to worry about a.) more! But if you live in a nice neighborhood, then you might be more concerned about b.)!
Quote from: iago on May 10, 2006, 08:13:12 AM
Why? 9/11 only killed 3000 people, and that was set up by at least 4, but probably over a dozen terrorists. that's less than 500 kills for those terrorists, compared to the 0 kills for almost everybody else who supported 9/11..
Terrorists aren't the worst problem in America. Neither were Communists or Witches. Scapegoats aren't the answer.
Yeah, but how many lives did it directly effect? How much money did it cost? How much time has it taken to fix it?
All of these things have direct impacts of the lives of others. Money could have been sent to starving people in Africa. The time could have been sent helping in underprivileged countries.
Terrorists > Rapists ... so far
Go terrorists go! You can take the cake. ::)
But seriously, terrorists are worse than rapists ... both ought to be hung in public, but as we've all seen somethings take priority over others
Quote from: MyndFyrex86] link=topic=5821.msg68935#msg68935 date=1147286668]
Quote from: iago on May 10, 2006, 01:29:19 PM
Incidentally, what worries you more:
a) Some guy walking down the street thinking about raping your little sister (or daughter)
b) Some guy in the middle-east trying to cause terror
I guess that choice is rather a personal decision...
That's an incredibly subjective question! If you live in the middle of the ghetto, of course you're going to worry about a.) more! But if you live in a nice neighborhood, then you might be more concerned about b.)!
Rich people can't be attracted to children?
Quote from: iago on May 10, 2006, 08:11:46 PM
Rich people can't be attracted to children?
Of course not. Look at Michael Jackson!
Quote from: deadly7 on May 10, 2006, 09:05:24 PM
Quote from: iago on May 10, 2006, 08:11:46 PM
Rich people can't be attracted to children?
Of course not. Look at Michael Jackson!
Exactly...MJ is broke now
Quote from: Sidoh on May 10, 2006, 04:21:03 PM
Quote from: iago on May 10, 2006, 08:13:12 AM
Why? 9/11 only killed 3000 people, and that was set up by at least 4, but probably over a dozen terrorists. that's less than 500 kills for those terrorists, compared to the 0 kills for almost everybody else who supported 9/11..
Terrorists aren't the worst problem in America. Neither were Communists or Witches. Scapegoats aren't the answer.
Yeah, but how many lives did it directly effect? How much money did it cost? How much time has it taken to fix it?
All of these things have direct impacts of the lives of others. Money could have been sent to starving people in Africa. The time could have been sent helping in underprivileged countries.
Since when has taking care of the rest of the world become the US's responsibility?
Quote from: Topaz on May 11, 2006, 08:16:02 PM
Since when has taking care of the rest of the world become the US's responsibility?
Since the tree-hugger lefties got into office. :P
We've been off fucking with other countries since the end of WWII.
Quote from: MyndFyrex86] link=topic=5821.msg69154#msg69154 date=1147403138]
Quote from: Topaz on May 11, 2006, 08:16:02 PM
Since when has taking care of the rest of the world become the US's responsibility?
Since the tree-hugger lefties got into office. :P
Bush is a tree-hugger lefty? Because he seems to be meddling with a lot of other countries..
Quote from: MyndFyrex86] link=topic=5821.msg69154#msg69154 date=1147403138]
Quote from: Topaz on May 11, 2006, 08:16:02 PM
Since when has taking care of the rest of the world become the US's responsibility?
Since the tree-hugger lefties got into office. :P
More like since the end of 1944. WWII sent a message to the U.S saying that all other countries are retarded and we need to be there to clean up their spit.
We've been involved in everyone else's business since like the beginning of America...its nothing new.
Quote from: iago on May 12, 2006, 09:22:12 AM
Quote from: MyndFyrex86] link=topic=5821.msg69154#msg69154 date=1147403138]
Quote from: Topaz on May 11, 2006, 08:16:02 PM
Since when has taking care of the rest of the world become the US's responsibility?
Since the tree-hugger lefties got into office. :P
Bush is a tree-hugger lefty? Because he seems to be meddling with a lot of other countries..
ZeroX said it. The question was asked "
Since when."