They got headline and summary wrong, but who the hell cares? Something I wrote is discussed on Slashdot!
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/20/0127215
(Take THAT, Myndfyre! :P)
For a second, I thought you meant x86labs.org got slashdotted. But then I knoticed the page is actully loading.
congrats :)
Quote from: chuck on March 20, 2007, 10:49:51 AM
For a second, I thought you meant x86labs.org got slashdotted. But then I noticed the page is actully loading.
congrats :)
Good point, fixed the title :P
I was considering writing about my assembly tutorial to Slashdot, but if it was accepted my server would never handle it. :)
Quote from: iago on March 20, 2007, 11:01:48 AM
Quote from: chuck on March 20, 2007, 10:49:51 AM
For a second, I thought you meant x86labs.org got slashdotted. But then I noticed the page is actully loading.
congrats :)
Good point, fixed the title :P
I was considering writing about my assembly tutorial to Slashdot, but if it was accepted my server would never handle it. :)
Not only that, it would be severely vandalized lol
Quote from: Towelie on March 20, 2007, 10:25:19 PM
Quote from: iago on March 20, 2007, 11:01:48 AM
Quote from: chuck on March 20, 2007, 10:49:51 AM
For a second, I thought you meant x86labs.org got slashdotted. But then I noticed the page is actully loading.
congrats :)
Good point, fixed the title :P
I was considering writing about my assembly tutorial to Slashdot, but if it was accepted my server would never handle it. :)
Not only that, it would be severely vandalized lol
Doubt it. But even if it was, I take a backup every night.
iago's a security nut researcher, remember? He'd know how to deal with the problem. :P