Clan x86

General Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: Newby on May 29, 2007, 10:38:20 PM

Title: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: Newby on May 29, 2007, 10:38:20 PM
http://video.nbcsandiego.com/player/?id=114346

My school doesn't think so, and I hope these kids go through with it. Just because I hate my school and want them to lose a battle they'll eventually lose. ;)
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: CrAz3D on May 29, 2007, 10:56:38 PM
Our schools just put in condom buckets (or something like that) in the nurse's office.
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: Newby on May 29, 2007, 10:59:42 PM
Our school uses "scare tactics" I guess. They over-describe the horrible consequences that STDs can have and insert their abstinence promotion blather here. I actually heard a kid who told his bio teacher he would NOT have sex until after high school. I said good luck in any relationship. :P
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: CrAz3D on May 29, 2007, 11:14:47 PM
wtf?  Why does he HAVE to have sex to have a relationship?


Also, they should be scaring the hell out of kids re: stds & especially babies!!!
WAY too many kids are having kids.
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: Warrior on May 29, 2007, 11:53:23 PM
My school gives out condoms, has hotlines, the works. Guess what? People still get pregnant.

Condoms arn't foolproof, neither is birth control. Shit happens.
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: iago on May 30, 2007, 12:05:51 AM
The thing about condoms is, you have to use them. I knew far too many people growing up who didn't like to use condoms. All I can say about that is, wtf?
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: CrAz3D on May 30, 2007, 01:30:43 AM
You don't HAVE to use them...cause you don't HAVE to have sex.  Also, even if you are, she could get one of those IEDs? and you could PIITP
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: trust on May 30, 2007, 08:45:21 AM
Quote from: iago on May 30, 2007, 12:05:51 AM
The thing about condoms is, you have to use them. I knew far too many people growing up who didn't like to use condoms. All I can say about that is, wtf?

They can take away from the feeling.
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: iago on May 30, 2007, 08:50:18 AM
Quote from: Trust on May 30, 2007, 08:45:21 AM
Quote from: iago on May 30, 2007, 12:05:51 AM
The thing about condoms is, you have to use them. I knew far too many people growing up who didn't like to use condoms. All I can say about that is, wtf?

They can take away from the feeling.

Yes, I know. But that's a small price to pay to prevent STDs, babies, etc.
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: CrAz3D on May 30, 2007, 09:59:22 AM
Quote from: Trust on May 30, 2007, 08:45:21 AM
Quote from: iago on May 30, 2007, 12:05:51 AM
The thing about condoms is, you have to use them. I knew far too many people growing up who didn't like to use condoms. All I can say about that is, wtf?

They can take away from the feeling.
polyurethane ones add a bit back to the feeling but are more expensive, i hear
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: Ender on June 07, 2007, 02:14:35 PM
Clearly it didn't work for Joe...
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: d&q on June 07, 2007, 03:16:21 PM
That was a weird Joe reference.
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: Joe on June 07, 2007, 04:05:20 PM
Quote from: Ender on June 07, 2007, 02:14:35 PM
Clearly it didn't work for Joe...

Colitus interuptus.
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: Ender on June 07, 2007, 04:27:28 PM
Quote from: Joex86/64] link=topic=9498.msg121338#msg121338 date=1181246720]
Quote from: Ender on June 07, 2007, 02:14:35 PM
Clearly it didn't work for Joe...

Colitus interuptus.

Premature ejaculation?
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: d&q on June 07, 2007, 05:05:14 PM
No, withdrawal, which rarely works.
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: iago on June 07, 2007, 05:10:58 PM
Quote from: Deuce on June 07, 2007, 05:05:14 PM
No, withdrawal, which rarely works.
Yeah, withdrawal does absolutely nothing to prevent STDs (AIDS, et al) and doesn't always prevent pregnancy, either.

Of course, this is the reason that "Abstinence-only" teaching is bad, and that kids should be taught this kind of stuff.
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: CrAz3D on June 07, 2007, 05:21:52 PM
Quote from: Ender on June 07, 2007, 02:14:35 PM
Clearly it didn't work for Joe...
Maybe Joe just missed that part of highschool, since he dropped out and all

</being a douche to Joe, <3  >
Title: Re: "Abstinence-only" teaching... archaic and useless?
Post by: psychspy on June 14, 2007, 05:29:09 AM
She won't get pregnant, and she won't get your STDs... if you kill her.  Muhahahahaha ^^