News:

Facebook killed the radio star. And by radio star, I mean the premise of distributed forums around the internet. And that got got by Instagram/SnapChat. And that got got by TikTok. Where the fuck is the internet we once knew?

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - vector

#1
Hdx, I thought I gave it to you when Frost Wraith gave it to me.
#2
Considering I knew a dang about how lockdown worked, and considering I had the expertise required, which I do not.
#3
I'm really curious. Hdx said he would update it a long time ago, but the laziness bug has set in. Anyone know if there is a current version with lockdown support, or does it have to be updated?
#4
Botdev / Re: a new BNCSutil?
October 02, 2007, 03:28:52 PM
Oh no, I'm not very good at programming. (Haven't gotten into TCP/IP either). It's just I'm heavily into the idea of making SC work for local hashing.

You say there is a BNCLutil with SC hashing support? I mean, what's so different with a JBLS/BNLS server being able to hash SC than BNCSutil?
#5
Botdev / Re: a new BNCSutil?
October 02, 2007, 12:39:58 PM
I heard that ForstWraith has the source to 1.3.3. Perhaps you guys could work on that source?
#6
Botdev / a new BNCSutil?
October 01, 2007, 10:10:33 PM
Well, the latest version for me would be 1.3.1.1. Is there a later version lingering around somewhere, and more importantly, does it support local hashing for SC?
#7
Botdev / Re: S > Clean C > dirty C
September 11, 2007, 06:42:58 PM
Quote from: Camel on September 05, 2007, 09:47:01 AM
Quote from: HdxBmx27 on September 04, 2007, 06:48:09 PM
Setup a server w/ a BNCS ad Sock5 end.
SC->Loalhost (Need a gateway editor)
SB->Proxy->Localhost->bnet!
When the proxy server gets 0x5e send to SC over the BNCS connection.
When SC sends the reply, send on the proxy.
Simple.
~Hdx

I don't believe it is that simple. From what I understand, the key to decrypt warden is based on the client/server tokens (specifically, the cd key hash), and therefore you really need to hijack SC's connection using the proxy rather than redirect just warden packets to it.

Of course, I've done no research in to this, I'm just going off of what I've read about it.
Well, from what I know about warden, it just needs a reply from the client, and since you are forwarding e5 to the dirty client (stealthbot), there should be no problem with this. I may be wrong though.
#8
Botdev / S > Clean C > dirty C
September 01, 2007, 02:38:18 AM
Now, I heard it was possible to bypass warden by connecting to warden on a clean client, then forwarding the data to the dirty client, in this case StealthBot, or what bot have you. How is this done?
#9
I'd like to join! / Hey, pick me!
September 01, 2007, 02:26:10 AM
It's me vectory from SB.net. Joe[x86] you may have seen me around. I never knew you were JoE ThE OdD, heh, now I do.