Re: Abortion ethics dilema

[Rule]

I'm still waiting for someone to comment on the posts Ender and I made in response to Myndfyre.  It seems whenever a good point is made, it is ignored or not acknowledged by the other side, and then the discussion is derailed with irrelevant nonsense by people like Crazed, and then the other side picks up on the irrelevant nonsense and resumes posting.

I have a job and I can't always post a thoughtful, thorough reply.  This is one of those instances.  When I can post one, you'll see it.

Cut the passive aggressive garbage.  I have a job too.  And you're pretty much completely cornered in this argument.  I don't think you have the strength of character to admit it though.  I don't think you have the strength of character to do anything but to continue to find rationalisations to support an initial position you have.

[CrAz3D]

oooooh, you think he's blowing you off so you're rationaliZing it by saying he is passive aggressive!

[iago]

I'm still waiting for someone to comment on the posts Ender and I made in response to Myndfyre.  It seems whenever a good point is made, it is ignored or not acknowledged by the other side, and then the discussion is derailed with irrelevant nonsense by people like Crazed, and then the other side picks up on the irrelevant nonsense and resumes posting.

I have a job and I can't always post a thoughtful, thorough reply.  This is one of those instances.  When I can post one, you'll see it.

Cut the passive aggressive garbage.  I have a job too.  And you're pretty much completely cornered in this argument.  I don't think you have the strength of character to admit it though.  I don't think you have the strength of character to do anything but to continue to find rationalisations to support an initial position you have.

Needlessly harsh, IMO.