Re: AdvancedContent CMS Version 2.0

[MyndFyre]

I just wanted to make a comment about something you said to me in PM about AC being better than YaBBDotNet.  I just wanted to tell you: congratulations on making something that is better than something that doesn't exist.  :P

You are teh leet h4x0r now.  :P

[Warrior]

It was AIM dolt.

[MyndFyre]

x86] link=topic=1826.msg35234#msg35234 date=1130197367]
It was AIM dolt.

That's still a private (hopefully) message.

G_G

[Warrior]

not since u posted wut i sed here.

LOL GGED NOOB.

[iago]

x86] link=topic=3472.msg35245#msg35245 date=1130198078]

x86] link=topic=1826.msg35234#msg35234 date=1130197367]
It was AIM dolt.

That's still a private (hopefully) message.

G_G

Unless you're using some form of encryption, then it's not, at least, not according to AIM's privacy policy.  :-P

[Quik]

x86] link=topic=3472.msg35245#msg35245 date=1130198078]

x86] link=topic=1826.msg35234#msg35234 date=1130197367]
It was AIM dolt.

That's still a private (hopefully) message.

G_G

Unless you're using some form of encryption, then it's not, at least, not according to AIM's privacy policy. :-P

http://www.snopes.com/computer/internet/aim.asp

[iago]

Legally, that agreement exists, and doesn't specifically SAY that it's only for information posted in public areas.  I think that in the press released discussed there, they were backpedalling.  They realized that people were pissed off at them and were trying to refix it.