Newby impeached!

[Joe]

Happy April fools day.

I don't know if it ever went public but last year we did technically impeach him, but never truly voted him out. Good fun!

[iago]

I don't think you know what "impeach" means ;)

[Blaze]

Not to be outdone by Joe...

http://www.x86labs.org/forum/index.php/topic,11759.msg148934.html#new

[iago]

Not to be outdone by Joe...

http://www.x86labs.org/forum/index.php/topic,11759.msg148934.html#new

What's with you and giving that crappy link? I mean, you aren't even linking to the top of the topic!

Try: http://www.x86labs.org/forum/index.php/board,92.0.html

[Joe]

I don't think you know what "impeach" means ;)

To impeach is to start a vote for removal.

Example:
The United States government started a vote in congress to remove President Clinton from office, but the vote failed.
Clan x86 started a vote to remove Queen Newby from office, but the vote failed (or was called off?).

[iago]

I don't think you know what "impeach" means ;)

To impeach is to start a vote for removal.

Example:
The United States government started a vote in congress to remove President Clinton from office, but the vote failed.
Clan x86 started a vote to remove Queen Newby from office, but the vote failed (or was called off?).

Note the "wink" -- that means I'm implying something dirty. :)

[CrAz3D]

I don't think you know what "impeach" means ;)

To impeach is to start a vote for removal.

Example:
The United States government started a vote in congress to remove President Clinton from office, but the vote failed.

You are not only retarded, but fucking retarded.

Clinton was impeached, as was President Johnson.  Neither were removed from office, however.

[Camel]

Technically, the word impeach has an even looser definition: to accuse. It's a very high accusation, though.

[Joe]

I don't think you know what "impeach" means ;)

To impeach is to start a vote for removal.

Example:
The United States government started a vote in congress to remove President Clinton from office, but the vote failed.

You are not only retarded, but fucking retarded.

Clinton was impeached, as was President Johnson.  Neither were removed from office, however.

You are not only retarded, but fucking retarded.

I SAID Clinton was impeached, and the vote to remove him from office failed. I also said Newby was impeached, but the vote to remove him from office failed.

[Warrior]

lets stop insulting each other
morons

[Ender]

I don't think you know what "impeach" means ;)

To impeach is to start a vote for removal.

Example:
The United States government started a vote in congress to remove President Clinton from office, but the vote failed.

You are not only retarded, but fucking retarded.

Clinton was impeached, as was President Johnson.  Neither were removed from office, however.

You are not only retarded, but fucking retarded.

I SAID Clinton was impeached, and the vote to remove him from office failed. I also said Newby was impeached, but the vote to remove him from office failed.

lawls

[CrAz3D]

I don't think you know what "impeach" means ;)

To impeach is to start a vote for removal.

Example:
The United States government started a vote in congress to remove President Clinton from office, but the vote failed.

You are not only retarded, but fucking retarded.

Clinton was impeached, as was President Johnson.  Neither were removed from office, however.

You are not only retarded, but fucking retarded.

I SAID Clinton was impeached, and the vote to remove him from office failed. I also said Newby was impeached, but the vote to remove him from office failed.

You said impeachment was starting a vote to remove someone, that is wrong.  Impeachment, specifically in the U.S. House of Reps., is simply a majority vote.  It isn't a vote for removal, it's more of what you might compare to a Grand Jury in the regular judicial system.

Conviction of the bad behavior is what removes him, that's another vote.

[Newby]

You said impeachment was starting a vote to remove someone, that is wrong.  Impeachment, specifically in the U.S. House of Reps., is simply a majority vote.  It isn't a vote for removal

Absolutely none of these, from a glance over, say you're right. :|

[CrAz3D]

The House of Representatives must first pass "articles of impeachment" by a simple majority.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment#Process

Then the Senate votes to convict (2/3 required to pass).


The House just says "OK, now the Senate can try him" just as Grand Juries say "OK, now the trial court can try him."

[Joe]

Number 6 in newby's list says I'm right.

I declare the horse dead. Want to give it CPR, Craz3d? It bled out, though, so it won't do much.