Author Topic: x86 on IRC  (Read 9115 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
x86 on IRC
« on: May 24, 2005, 11:05:42 pm »
For those of you that didn't know, x86 has been on IRC, for months. I've recently seen some of you idling #vl, and have NEVER seen you in our IRC channel, that's just lame.

Anyway....

Server: irc.tehnetwork.org:6667

Channel: #x86


Note: If you're going to be as immature as is seen sometimes in the channel, and on these forums. Stick to the battle.net channel and don't even waste our time by coming to the channel. <3
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2005, 11:06:52 pm »
I agree.

If you missed the news announcement on it that was around for a while, you need help.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline Warrior

  • supreme mac daddy of trolls
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7503
  • One for a Dime two for a Quarter!
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2005, 11:22:17 pm »
pshh #x86 is boring. Even stricter and crappier than the channel. I wonder if we should all but on our R2D2 costumes and do precise reciept calculations with our nipples.
One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2005, 11:41:42 pm »
Wtf? Thats why we abandoned the channel.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2005, 12:47:36 am »
If you have a problem with the moderation on IRC (which is noticably stricter, since we really don't want immaturity around on IRC), stick to Battle.net.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2005, 08:47:24 am »
If you have a problem with the moderation on IRC (which is noticably stricter, since we really don't want immaturity around on IRC), stick to Battle.net.

./signed
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #6 on: May 27, 2005, 11:27:17 am »
If you have a problem with the moderation on IRC (which is noticably stricter, since we really don't want immaturity around on IRC), stick to Battle.net.

/sign

:)

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2005, 02:20:23 pm »
I'm sad. I write an IRC client so that I have a decent interface to chat with you all on, and you aren't ever on. Gr.

Anyhow, the channels registered to me now, instead of Newby. Newby, if you want it back, contact me.

Anyhow, get on!
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline drka

  • ffdshow > in_mp3.dll
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 330
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #8 on: August 18, 2005, 09:53:01 pm »
make one that can be used on a website.

*slobbers at activex*

edit:even if you make an IRC client, ChatZilla will own it.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2005, 11:45:19 pm »
GET ON.

k?
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


dx

  • Guest
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #10 on: September 19, 2005, 08:22:35 pm »
If you have a problem with the moderation on IRC (which is noticably stricter, since we really don't want immaturity around on IRC), stick to Battle.net.
Stricter? Oh, you might actually take action against idiots because it's NOT battle.net?

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #11 on: September 19, 2005, 08:27:22 pm »
If you have a problem with the moderation on IRC (which is noticably stricter, since we really don't want immaturity around on IRC), stick to Battle.net.
Stricter? Oh, you might actually take action against idiots because it's NOT battle.net?

Yes.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2005, 07:06:20 am »
I used go, but nobody set me to +v, so I gave up.

dx

  • Guest
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2005, 03:07:18 pm »
Why do you need to be +v? Besides the occasional time they might have the channel mode set to +m...

Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #14 on: September 20, 2005, 03:18:50 pm »
Which is generally only when bsd joins..
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #15 on: September 20, 2005, 05:03:30 pm »
Which is generally only when bsd joins..

Yeah. If bsd can't talk, he can't ask who x86labs.org belongs to, and can't DDoS it. :P
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #16 on: September 20, 2005, 06:00:55 pm »
I don't think he cared who ran it, I think he just wanted to dos something.
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #17 on: September 20, 2005, 08:28:56 pm »
This isn't the members forum. Quiet you two. =)
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #18 on: September 20, 2005, 09:22:54 pm »
Why do you need to be +v? Besides the occasional time they might have the channel mode set to +m...
So I can chat?

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #19 on: September 20, 2005, 09:57:58 pm »
Not if BSD is there, because of BSD is there we have a crisis. Newby set it -m about an hour ago.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2005, 06:41:30 am »
Not if BSD is there, because of BSD is there we have a crisis. Newby set it -m about an hour ago.

It's not hard to kickban somebody.
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.

Offline Screenor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1611
  • My own little world.
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2005, 04:39:37 pm »
#1: Who is BSD?

I haven't been here a while, and normally don't/never will care about people outside my circle of close friends if he's been around for a good period of time.

#2: Rabbit, I'll give you +v if need be, I don't really find a problem, if Newby tells me otherwise I'll change that though.

So come on whenever.

dx

  • Guest
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #22 on: September 21, 2005, 06:21:54 pm »
Scr33n0r is +o in #x86? Oh god, hahahaha. Maybe bsd should just hit x86labs.org constantly.

Offline Screenor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1611
  • My own little world.
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #23 on: September 21, 2005, 06:24:28 pm »
Scr33n0r is +o in #x86? Oh god, hahahaha. Maybe bsd should just hit x86labs.org constantly.
Hah, I could really care less, there's a good chance I could get ops nearly anywhere I wanted to if I felt the need to respect people. :P

Besides that, almost anyone who comes in there gets ops, so heh.

dx

  • Guest
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #24 on: September 21, 2005, 06:49:59 pm »
*shrug*

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #25 on: September 21, 2005, 07:22:27 pm »
Scr33n0r is +o in #x86? Oh god, hahahaha. Maybe bsd should just hit x86labs.org constantly.

Everybody is +o in #beta? Oh god, why doesn't bsd hit betaproductions.net constantly?

We flip between +o'ing everybody and then +o'ing members randomly. One day it'll be one, one day it'll be the other!

On a side note, why does it matter how #x86 is run if you aren't there / don't care about it?

EDIT -- Before you even call us a wannabe-beta, tmp made the comparison of us to beta a loong long time ago (in a good way), way before we started opping everybody.
« Last Edit: September 21, 2005, 07:25:55 pm by Newby »
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

dx

  • Guest
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #26 on: September 21, 2005, 07:59:08 pm »
Your edit was un-needed, seeing as I wasn't going to mention that at all. Why doesn't bsd hit x86labs.org constantly? I can list a few reasons, but I wont. Everyone being a oper in #beta seems wrong in my mind, but it doesn't matter what I think.

Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
Re: x86 on IRC
« Reply #27 on: September 21, 2005, 08:01:12 pm »
There are a few reasons why bsd doesn't hit x86labs.org. Anyhow, oping everyone in #x86 doesn't matter, cause if something happened it would take me about 3.4 seconds to have TehUser, torque, or warz sort it out. (The IRCops.) If our channel was on efnet or something, then it would matter who gets ops.
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.