Author Topic: MacBook 2.1 - Odd Problems  (Read 8516 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: MacBook 2.1 - Odd Problems
« Reply #15 on: December 09, 2009, 10:41:57 am »
So what goes in to calculating the "actual" RAM limit? Just the fact that 4GB sticks are the highest capacity currently manufactured?
Probably the northbridge.

they're not copy-protection thugs
Yeah, they're just the only PC manufacturer that includes a DRM chip specifically so that you can run their OS.... ::)
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline Camel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1703
    • View Profile
    • BNU Bot
Re: MacBook 2.1 - Odd Problems
« Reply #16 on: December 10, 2009, 08:43:31 am »
So what goes in to calculating the "actual" RAM limit? Just the fact that 4GB sticks are the highest capacity currently manufactured?
It's a completely arbitrary limit in the kernel. All Intel Macs have had PAE, so the hardware supports 64GB, but the kernel does not.

I would guess that, at the time the computer came out, that was as much RAM as they could cram in there to test the kernel against. Apple have never in the history of the company existing added support for an existing hardware feature after a product was released without support (except 802.11n in G2 MacBooks, but they charged for it), so don't expect them to "fix" it ever.

Yeah, they're just the only PC manufacturer that includes a DRM chip specifically so that you can run their OS.... ::)
Apple is definitely not the only PC manufacturer that includes TPM chips in their computers. Most laptops have them, actually. Every machine Dell currently sells has one. I've even seen some motherboards on NewEgg that have them.

Console and cell phone manufacturers get away with locking down their products. I don't think it's insane for Apple to do the same. Also, it's actually just a TPM chip, not specifically designed to perform DRM; it's used for legitimate purposes too, such as securing the keychain. The chip is just some WOM (a private key store) and a simple processor optimized for doing cryptographic operations, so there's nothing inherently unjust about having one.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2009, 08:50:59 am by Camel »

<Camel> i said what what
<Blaze> in the butt
<Camel> you want to do it in my butt?
<Blaze> in my butt
<Camel> let's do it in the butt
<Blaze> Okay!

Offline Krazed

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
    • View Profile
Re: MacBook 2.1 - Odd Problems
« Reply #17 on: December 12, 2009, 02:35:54 pm »
My memory arrived today, and all is well. Good looks on the suggestion, Camel! Plus, everywhere I had read states my MacBook will only show 3GB of ram because that is the most supported, howeverrr it shows all 4GB which is pretty awesome. So yeah, I'm pretty excited about it.
It is good to be good, but it is better to be lucky.

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: MacBook 2.1 - Odd Problems
« Reply #18 on: December 16, 2009, 11:13:57 am »
Apple is definitely not the only PC manufacturer that includes TPM chips in their computers.
Sorry, I'll try restating this...
Yeah, they're just the only PC manufacturer that includes a DRM chip specifically so that you can run their OS.... ::)
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.