Author Topic: Newest piece of... (Read 9257 times)

Tuberload · « **on:** July 17, 2005, 06:26:38 pm »

... crap.

That's right this sucks. Just wanted to show the first creation in my on going brushing experience.. I will add things from time to time. Hopefully I will get better.

http://67.185.36.85/images/Celestial_1.gif

Tuberload · « **Reply #1 on:** July 18, 2005, 12:25:55 am »

Well here is the next evolution of my series:

http://67.185.36.85/images/CELESTIAL_2.png

I think it's 100% better than the first, but still nothing special.

Super_X · « **Reply #2 on:** July 18, 2005, 01:54:11 am »

I like them both, actually. They are quite good I think. I kind of like how you have opacity set up, it looks like clouds. Very good.

Sidoh · « **Reply #3 on:** July 18, 2005, 02:15:27 am »

I don't much like the first one, but the second looks really neat.

You should make some things that look that cool that are more suitable for a desktop.

Blaze · « **Reply #4 on:** July 18, 2005, 09:13:18 am »

I like the first better... $:-\$

deadly7 · « **Reply #5 on:** July 18, 2005, 09:44:05 am »

Your newest piece of crap owns the best image I've ever made. :\

Tuberload · « **Reply #6 on:** July 18, 2005, 01:13:47 pm »

Quote from: Sidoh on July 18, 2005, 02:15:27 am

I don't much like the first one, but the second looks really neat.

You should make some things that look that cool that are more suitable for a desktop.

What resolution do you prefer? I will make one that size in time.

Tuberload · « **Reply #7 on:** July 18, 2005, 01:14:48 pm »

Quote from: deadly7 on July 18, 2005, 09:44:05 am

Your newest piece of crap owns the best image I've ever made. :\

I am fairly happy with the new one. There is still a lot wrong with it but it didn't turn out to bad. Thanks.

Tuberload · « **Reply #8 on:** July 18, 2005, 01:26:34 pm »

Quote from: Super_X on July 18, 2005, 01:54:11 am

I like them both, actually. They are quite good I think. I kind of like how you have opacity set up, it looks like clouds. Very good.

Thank you.

It background cointains a lot of soft brushes of various size, color, opacity, and flow rate. The foreground is a varying texturized brush. I also used the smudge tool quite a bit. I am slowely starting to learn.

Tuberload · « **Reply #9 on:** July 18, 2005, 01:27:33 pm »

Quote from: Blaze on July 18, 2005, 09:13:18 am

I like the first better... $:-\$

Hey, whatever tickles your pickle.

deadly7 · « **Reply #10 on:** July 18, 2005, 01:42:16 pm »

Tubby, what's your AIM? I have some good abstract+cloud brushes you might like for this piece.

Tuberload · « **Reply #11 on:** July 18, 2005, 01:58:22 pm »

Quote from: deadly7 on July 18, 2005, 01:42:16 pm

Tubby, what's your AIM? I have some good abstract+cloud brushes you might like for this piece.

My AIM is Tuberload.

Sidoh · « **Reply #12 on:** July 18, 2005, 05:58:08 pm »

Why do you post more than once in a row, Tuberload?

1280x1024 would be optimal for me, but any resolution that can be resized to that without any or much distortion would be great too.

And yes, I like the second one a considerable amount more as well.

Warrior · « **Reply #13 on:** July 18, 2005, 10:00:22 pm »

Wow Tubby, if you resize the second one mind posting it here? I like it.

Tuberload · « **Reply #14 on:** July 18, 2005, 11:03:40 pm »

Quote from: Warrior on July 18, 2005, 10:00:22 pm

Wow Tubby, if you resize the second one mind posting it here? I like it.

I am going to start another one here soon and I will make it large enough that I can down size it to fit most peoples resolutions. What size do you prefer?

Tuberload · « **Reply #15 on:** July 18, 2005, 11:05:17 pm »

Quote from: Sidoh on July 18, 2005, 05:58:08 pm

Why do you post more than once in a row, Tuberload?

1280x1024 would be optimal for me, but any resolution that can be resized to that without any or much distortion would be great too.

And yes, I like the second one a considerable amount more as well.

I have always posted seperately if I am talking to different people. I guess it just keeps my conversations seperated.

I'll keep you updated on the next time around. I don't think this image would look to good upsized that much.

Sidoh · « **Reply #16 on:** July 19, 2005, 02:40:51 am »

Quote from: Tuberload on July 18, 2005, 11:03:40 pm

Quote from: Warrior on July 18, 2005, 10:00:22 pm
Wow Tubby, if you resize the second one mind posting it here? I like it.

I am going to start another one here soon and I will make it large enough that I can down size it to fit most peoples resolutions. What size do you prefer?

Awesome.

Warrior · « **Reply #17 on:** July 19, 2005, 11:50:50 am »

1024x768 plz

Joe · « **Reply #18 on:** July 28, 2005, 01:05:33 am »

1600x900 plz

Krazed · « **Reply #19 on:** July 29, 2005, 05:16:24 pm »

1024x768. =)

Tuberload · « **Reply #20 on:** July 30, 2005, 06:15:27 am »

My motivation levels have gone back down to an all time low as far as my interest in computers are concerned. It may be a little while before I finish another piece of art like this, but when I do I plan on mixing a lot more techniques that I have learned and make a more elaborate celestial scene. I should be able to produce a copy in all resolutions but Joe's and possible Sidohs because I am unfortunately not rich enough to own a computer that is fast enough to handle such a large image without pissing me off to the point of throwing it out the window, sorry.

Sidoh · « **Reply #21 on:** August 14, 2005, 03:46:21 pm »

I don't know how many of us use LCD's, but 1208x1024 is native resolution (as I'm sure you know) for almost all LCD monitors.

I really doubt you care, and the one I'm using now is 1204x768 anyway.

News:

Author Topic: Newest piece of... (Read 9257 times)