News:

Pretty crazy that we're closer to 2030, than we are 2005. Where did the time go!

Main Menu

Nevada to vote to legalize it

Started by Newby, October 17, 2006, 10:21:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Newby

- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 AM
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

trust


CrAz3D

Quote from: OG Trust on October 17, 2006, 10:52:51 PM
It's still against federal law.
word.

I move that we arrest Nevada as a state!

leet_muffin

The douchebag method:
Quote from: Trust on April 19, 2008, 02:58:00 AM
fuck allfo you i dont give a fuck ill fight everyone of you fuck that sbhit fuck you

CrAz3D


leet_muffin

Quote from: CrAz3D on October 17, 2006, 11:01:27 PM
Quote from: leet_muffin on October 17, 2006, 10:59:37 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on October 17, 2006, 10:54:34 PM
I move that we arrest Nevada as a state!

I second.
...I guess this means Newby should call it to a vote now

No need. I second-ed. Motion passed.
The douchebag method:
Quote from: Trust on April 19, 2008, 02:58:00 AM
fuck allfo you i dont give a fuck ill fight everyone of you fuck that sbhit fuck you

d&q

I was under the impression that state law supersedes federal law ??? At least in some cases...
The writ of the founders must endure.

Newby

Quote from: Deuce on October 17, 2006, 11:43:20 PM
I was under the impression that state law supersedes federal law ??? At least in some cases...

I learned that in AP US History too!
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 AM
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

CrAz3D

Quote from: Deuce on October 17, 2006, 11:43:20 PM
I was under the impression that state law supersedes federal law ??? At least in some cases...

Federal law trumps state law where the Feds have the authority to make laws

Newby

I thought the Constitution was an agreement between the states, and if a state finds a law to be unconstitutional, they could nullify it...

Correct me where I'm wrong, because apparently that won't happen.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 AM
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

leet_muffin

Quote from: Newby on October 18, 2006, 12:13:02 AM
I thought the Constitution was an agreement between the states, and if a state finds a law to be unconstitutional, they could nullify it...

Correct me where I'm wrong, because apparently that won't happen.

That's what South Carolina said. Then the president at the time (I think it was Jackson?) said "Hey, fuck you." and began military preparations to attack South Carolina if they did not comply. They complied. Hence, states only have jurisdiction where it has yet to be claimed by federal government.
The douchebag method:
Quote from: Trust on April 19, 2008, 02:58:00 AM
fuck allfo you i dont give a fuck ill fight everyone of you fuck that sbhit fuck you

CrAz3D

I think states might be able to sue to establish Constitutionality, not sure about just ignoring it.

Super_X

If federal agents arrest some one, it's illegal, if state or more local policefind some one doing it, it's not illegal. State officials swear to abide by State laws, not necessaraly federal laws.

Towelie

Quote from: Newby on October 18, 2006, 12:13:02 AM
I thought the Constitution was an agreement between the states, and if a state finds a law to be unconstitutional, they could nullify it...

Correct me where I'm wrong, because apparently that won't happen.
Isn't this where there can be 2 different interpretations of the constitution? strict & loose? One where the power is in the states, the other in the gov't.

iago

#14
QuoteTwelve states have decriminalized small amounts of marijuana - that is, possession is punishable by a ticket and a fine - and 11 allow its use for medical purposes. Possession of up to an ounce at home is legal in Alaska under a court ruling there, but the case is under appeal.

Seems like the law is perfectly possible?


Also, I 100% agree with this guy:
Quote"Make no mistake, I don't think using marijuana is a wise choice for anyone," said the Rev. William C. Webb, a Baptist minister who joined dozens of other religious leaders in announcing their backing. But "if there has to be a market in marijuana, I'd rather it be regulated with sensible safeguards than run by violent gangs and dangerous drug dealers."
It's a dumb choice, but people will do it anyways...