If you don't indulge in it then you don't understand trolling. See my last two sentences.
Your last sentences are overgeneralized assumptions.
But somehow your theory about understanding yet not indulging is? Personal beliefs don't equate fact.
Difference between the beliefs I outlined and those that you outlined is that mine are an agreed with and time tested definition of trolling in it's purest art.
We consider trolling to be a logical extension to communication, which is why we advocate it's use. You consider it to be the opposite, which means your claims of understanding are put in there to fluff over your attack on us later.
You can't understand and not agree with us, our logic is infalliable.