Author Topic: JBBE!  (Read 21711 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #30 on: November 21, 2005, 06:22:03 pm »
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #31 on: November 22, 2005, 09:46:42 pm »
I'm seriously considering writing a CleanSlateBot in VC++ (as an educational-only project, don't expect it to be released as a product), to learn the language a bit more, than writing JBBEv2 in VC++.

I hope that doesn't sound like Programming ADHD to you. IMO, its more of Programming Innovation, but you can call it what you want.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #32 on: November 23, 2005, 03:22:05 am »
For a REALLY educational project, write CSB in C++/ATL to support COM and use it in VB!
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #33 on: November 23, 2005, 06:38:11 pm »
I was thinking about this while staring off into dead space after finishing my math test. I basically have two options.

1) Restart in nothing but C++. I'd probably want to rename it, JBCE (JoeBot C++ Edition) =p

2) Take a SphtBot-ish aproach. Make a DLL in C++, then port my functions to C++ and rely more and more on the DLL instead of internal VB, until the majority is finished, and then patch it all back together.

I'll probably take option 2, asuming I take either, because I'll fail like a blittering idiot if I even attempt #1.

That aside, I need VC++. =p
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Explicit

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
  • Hail Bender!
    • View Profile
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #34 on: November 23, 2005, 08:22:21 pm »
I was thinking about this while staring off into dead space after finishing my math test. I basically have two options.

1) Restart in nothing but C++. I'd probably want to rename it, JBCE (JoeBot C++ Edition) =p

2) Take a SphtBot-ish aproach. Make a DLL in C++, then port my functions to C++ and rely more and more on the DLL instead of internal VB, until the majority is finished, and then patch it all back together.

I'll probably take option 2, asuming I take either, because I'll fail like a blittering idiot if I even attempt #1.

That aside, I need VC++. =p

You're dial-up.  Good luck getting it.
Quote
Like all things in life, pumping is just a primitive, degenerate form of bending.

Quote
Hey, I don't tell you how to tell me what to do, so don't tell me how to do what you tell me to do! ... Bender knows when to use finesse.

[13:41:45]<@Fapiko> Why is TehUser asking for wang pictures?
[13:42:03]<@TehUser> I wasn't asking for wang pictures, I was looking at them.
[13:47:40]<@TehUser> Mine's fairly short.

Offline wires

  • Pwnage
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1103
  • cocaine is fun!
    • View Profile
    • Weapon Of Mass Destruction
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #35 on: November 23, 2005, 09:09:24 pm »
I was thinking about this while staring off into dead space after finishing my math test. I basically have two options.

1) Restart in nothing but C++. I'd probably want to rename it, JBCE (JoeBot C++ Edition) =p

2) Take a SphtBot-ish aproach. Make a DLL in C++, then port my functions to C++ and rely more and more on the DLL instead of internal VB, until the majority is finished, and then patch it all back together.

I'll probably take option 2, asuming I take either, because I'll fail like a blittering idiot if I even attempt #1.

That aside, I need VC++. =p
I can send it to you.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #36 on: November 23, 2005, 09:50:29 pm »
JBBE v0.12 has been released.
A bunch of bug fixes, most notably the parsing of EID_TALK and EID_EMOTE.
Added the /bnftp <file> command, but its kinda broken, so eh?
Known Issues file has been merged with todo.txt.

JBBE v0.12
BNCSUtil
Changelog
To-Do
Readme

EDIT -
Thanks WiReS.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Ender

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2390
    • View Profile
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #37 on: November 24, 2005, 09:41:24 pm »
gj joe.

Don't go to vc++ ! Stay with Java ! Or is it too strong for you ? (not derogatory, a joke reference to coffee, tea, and their reflection on manliness...)

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #38 on: November 24, 2005, 10:08:29 pm »
Nah, I just don't like the way Swing windows look, and if I used a native Windows UI, then I'd be killing compatability with UNIX/GNU, so I might as well use a more efficient back-end as well.

EDIT -
Adding support for RCRS checkrevision.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Warrior

  • supreme mac daddy of trolls
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7503
  • One for a Dime two for a Quarter!
    • View Profile
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #39 on: November 24, 2005, 10:53:12 pm »
Just set the look&feel to off.
One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #40 on: November 24, 2005, 11:10:56 pm »
Would that draw as a native-looking window in, say, WindowMaker or Gnome, too?
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Warrior

  • supreme mac daddy of trolls
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7503
  • One for a Dime two for a Quarter!
    • View Profile
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #41 on: November 25, 2005, 12:11:38 am »
Sure I guess.
One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #42 on: November 25, 2005, 12:17:07 am »
I'll have to consider it. Meanwhile, where's my code for the channel list? Man, you're slow. Even WiReS is faster than you!

WiReS rocks!
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Warrior

  • supreme mac daddy of trolls
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7503
  • One for a Dime two for a Quarter!
    • View Profile
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #43 on: November 25, 2005, 02:51:29 am »
Broken keyboard.
One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

Offline wires

  • Pwnage
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1103
  • cocaine is fun!
    • View Profile
    • Weapon Of Mass Destruction
Re: JBBE!
« Reply #44 on: November 25, 2005, 11:04:53 am »
I'll have to consider it. Meanwhile, where's my code for the channel list? Man, you're slow. Even WiReS is faster than you!

WiReS rocks!
Too bad you don't use the sexier code. :(