Facebook killed the radio star. And by radio star, I mean the premise of distributed forums around the internet. And that got got by Instagram/SnapChat. And that got got by TikTok. Where the fuck is the internet we once knew?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I actually do see their reasoning behind this. I'm pretty sure that tech support would comply if a good enough reason was given, though.
Who gives a damn? I fuck sheep all the time.
And yes, male both ends. There are a couple lesbians that need a two-ended dildo...My router just refuses to wear a strap-on.
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there
Our species really annoys me.
I think this is the stupidest thing to date Microsoft has done. Seriously. They're apparently not satisfied enough that someone is spending $400 on their software, but when that person upgrades because his current computer is shitty, they have to buy their OS again? If that's not what "users must obtain a new license" means, feel free to correct me. Just how I interpreted it.
Is this the inherent ruling? If you an upgrade a PC, there's absolutely no way it'll work?
If you upgrade the motherboard, OEM versions of Windows will no longer work. As far as I know, that's the absolute ruling.
[20:21:13] xar: i was just thinking about the time iago came over here and we made this huge bomb and light up the sky for 6 min[20:21:15] xar: that was funny
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby[17:32:58] <xar> new rule[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 amI'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.That analogy doesn't even make sense. Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT.
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.
For the personal user, this isn't an issue. Microsoft requires such high standards of hardware (compared to some Linux distros or Unix / variations) that the personal user would have to be running something less current than Windows XP to have much of a reason to upgrade the motherboard.
Quote from: Quik on February 24, 2006, 07:03:07 pmFor the personal user, this isn't an issue. Microsoft requires such high standards of hardware (compared to some Linux distros or Unix / variations) that the personal user would have to be running something less current than Windows XP to have much of a reason to upgrade the motherboard.You could easily run XP on a 1.5ghz and upgrade to a 3.2ghz processor, which would likely require a new board.
Quote from: iago on February 24, 2006, 07:05:43 pmQuote from: Quik on February 24, 2006, 07:03:07 pmFor the personal user, this isn't an issue. Microsoft requires such high standards of hardware (compared to some Linux distros or Unix / variations) that the personal user would have to be running something less current than Windows XP to have much of a reason to upgrade the motherboard.You could easily run XP on a 1.5ghz and upgrade to a 3.2ghz processor, which would likely require a new board. If you're that far in the past, you shouldn't mind paying a few extra bucks for the OS. From all the money you've saved not upgrading your system for 10 years, you can afford it.Yeah, I realize my logic is flawed, but I still think that it's not too much of an issue for home users, especially those intelligent/daring enough not to use Windows or not to pay an arm and a leg.