Author Topic: [MATH] Calculus Review Packet  (Read 9027 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: [MATH] Calculus Review Packet
« Reply #15 on: October 26, 2006, 02:44:15 am »
It depends.  Most people who write 1/infinity mean more precisely lim y--> infinity 1/y, so the answer is "yes" in most cases.  However, I think saying "yes" for all cases would be over-restrictive, unless we add all sorts of conditions about the "rate" of approaching infinity, etc.  Regardless of whether you think of infinity as some 'closed entity' (for lack of a better term) or not, (and some would argue that this is a bad interpretation, although I think it does have some merit), we can see that in this particular case 1/'infinity' and lim x--> infinity 1/x are equivalent, as both equal zero.

Yeah, that's sort of what I would have guessed.

In any case, can you elaborate on the "closed entity" or does it require a heavy background in mathematics that I don't have (yet)?  It sounds like an interesting concept.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: [MATH] Calculus Review Packet
« Reply #16 on: October 26, 2006, 09:36:47 am »
Not to mention . . . undefined.
Isn't it 0? I only ask because that's what we do in calculus.

Indeed.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: [MATH] Calculus Review Packet
« Reply #17 on: October 26, 2006, 11:12:38 am »
Indeed.

Pff.  Just because I don't memorize little tables of data. :P