When I try to change the settings of plugins in bot I get the list of 38 plugins, although there are 39 of them. The one missing in CommandlineConfiguration.jar i Whisper on Leave Plugin. It's working fine in Swing, but it's not listed in commandline. It's there actually because if I type 39, its configuration appears, it's just not on the list. I tested it on two bots so I guess it's not just my fault ;P .
Sounds like the classic off-by-one-bug. But I'm too lazy to look!
Just small FYI, to do when you guys release Beta 43 ;) .
I want to make beta43 the final release and then not "release" it anymore. Hdx is currently writing a CVS updater, I believe.. I'm not sure what he's doing exactly, but we're planning on trying to keep the CVS as safe as possible and have users just update off of that.
Lol, some maintainer you are.
I'm a revolutionary! We're trying to get our customers (doesn't that involve money? hm) the fastest updates possible, deliver bugfixes reliably, and still have them be running safe code. :)
Quote from: Joex86/64] link=topic=9023.msg114559#msg114559 date=1176078984]
Sounds like the classic off-by-one-bug. But I'm too lazy to look!
I associate off-by-one flaws with 0day exploits.
Quote from: Newby on April 22, 2007, 05:06:44 PM
Quote from: Joex86/64] link=topic=9023.msg114559#msg114559 date=1176078984]
Sounds like the classic off-by-one-bug. But I'm too lazy to look!
I associate off-by-one flaws with 0day exploits.
Then you're weird. Off-by-one flaws are almost always impossible or extremely hard to exploit.
Quote from: iago on April 22, 2007, 06:01:06 PM
Quote from: Newby on April 22, 2007, 05:06:44 PM
Quote from: Joex86/64] link=topic=9023.msg114559#msg114559 date=1176078984]
Sounds like the classic off-by-one-bug. But I'm too lazy to look!
I associate off-by-one flaws with 0day exploits.
Then you're weird. Off-by-one flaws are almost always impossible or extremely hard to exploit.
...Unless your trying to drive a normal user insane
Quote from: iago on April 22, 2007, 06:01:06 PM
Quote from: Newby on April 22, 2007, 05:06:44 PM
Quote from: Joex86/64] link=topic=9023.msg114559#msg114559 date=1176078984]
Sounds like the classic off-by-one-bug. But I'm too lazy to look!
I associate off-by-one flaws with 0day exploits.
Then you're weird. Off-by-one flaws are almost always impossible or extremely hard to exploit.
Shrug. I've never heard of it called an "Off-by-one bug"; just called "off-by-one exploit."
In my programming class, it was called "off by one bug", although when spoke, almost always pronounced OBOB (like Oh Bob).