One position in CommandlineConfiguration.jar missing

[Ajan]

When I try to change the settings of plugins in bot I get the list of 38 plugins, although there are 39 of them. The one missing in CommandlineConfiguration.jar i Whisper on Leave Plugin. It's working fine in Swing, but it's not listed in commandline. It's there actually because if I type 39, its configuration appears, it's just not on the list. I tested it on two bots so I guess it's not just my fault ;P .

[Joe]

Sounds like the classic off-by-one-bug. But I'm too lazy to look!

[Ajan]

Just small FYI, to do when you guys release Beta 43 ;) .

[Joe]

I want to make beta43 the final release and then not "release" it anymore. Hdx is currently writing a CVS updater, I believe.. I'm not sure what he's doing exactly, but we're planning on trying to keep the CVS as safe as possible and have users just update off of that.

[Warrior]

Lol, some maintainer you are.

[Joe]

I'm a revolutionary! We're trying to get our customers (doesn't that involve money? hm) the fastest updates possible, deliver bugfixes reliably, and still have them be running safe code. :)

[Newby]

x86/64] link=topic=9023.msg114559#msg114559 date=1176078984]
Sounds like the classic off-by-one-bug. But I'm too lazy to look!

I associate off-by-one flaws with 0day exploits.

[iago]

x86/64] link=topic=9023.msg114559#msg114559 date=1176078984]
Sounds like the classic off-by-one-bug. But I'm too lazy to look!

I associate off-by-one flaws with 0day exploits.

Then you're weird. Off-by-one flaws are almost always impossible or extremely hard to exploit.

[chuck]

x86/64] link=topic=9023.msg114559#msg114559 date=1176078984]
Sounds like the classic off-by-one-bug. But I'm too lazy to look!

I associate off-by-one flaws with 0day exploits.

Then you're weird. Off-by-one flaws are almost always impossible or extremely hard to exploit.

...Unless your trying to drive a normal user insane

[Newby]

x86/64] link=topic=9023.msg114559#msg114559 date=1176078984]
Sounds like the classic off-by-one-bug. But I'm too lazy to look!

I associate off-by-one flaws with 0day exploits.

Then you're weird. Off-by-one flaws are almost always impossible or extremely hard to exploit.

Shrug. I've never heard of it called an "Off-by-one bug"; just called "off-by-one exploit."

[Joe]

In my programming class, it was called "off by one bug", although when spoke, almost always pronounced OBOB (like Oh Bob).