Sentenced to 45 days for DUI on suspended license.
Speculation said 23 w/good behavior.
After 3 days she was released for "medical reasons" but today the judge said "NO FUCKING WAY you dumbass sheriffs (I hope that they get held in contempt), that bitch is in the slammer for the full 45 now, PWN!"
Picturey goodness:
(http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Video/070608/paris_01b.300w.jpg)
ahahahahahahahahahahaha
LOL.
On a similar note, Sarah Silverman apparently pissed her off pretty badly:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjBt_C1cg8c
Hahaha.
Edit: It seems that viacom claimed copyright infringement on the last one, but it seems the same guy reposted it. I changed the link.
That'll learn her.
I hope she gets assraped by Big Bubba. It'll be fucking awesome.
Hell, I'll go commit a crime up in L.A. and go to jail with her, and fuck her ass myself.
... I don't think I've got the girth to fit in her ass though. :|
still, she'll be in a special cell
She shouldn't have been placed under house arrest after the "medical" excuse, but her sentence should not have been moved back to 45: since it was changed to 23 (which I didn't agree with) and she started her jail time on that sentence, it should have stayed that way when the judge ordered her back - to do anything else is just vindictive, not fair or just.
As I understood, 23 was just speculation taking into account "good behavior" time
How the hell does someone achieve "good behavior" in three days?
Quote from: Blaze on June 08, 2007, 08:41:55 PM
How the hell does someone achieve "good behavior" in three days?
Easy. Become a celebrity.
Haha... I'm guessing she was wallowing in self pity, screaming, crying, etc. I'd say that there were some guards who were sympathetic toward her and claimed she was "psychologically instable" or something.
Ok, first of all, it was reduced to a 23 day sentence. That wasn't speculation. Look up "paris hilton 23 day" on google, and a number of news sources will confirm that. Second, I agree that having the sentence reduced for "good behavior" was inappropriate, but once it was done it should not be reversed.
Third, I think it's obvious why the sheriff re-assigned her.
And finally, this is an issue of someone getting special treatment because she is a celebrity and also getting unusually harsh treatment for the same reason. Her initial prison term was longer than usual, and it was extremely unprofessional to lengthen her jail term after it had been officially reduced. On the other hand, the sheriff's treatment seems preferential and it was strange that her initial jail term was reduced for "good behavior" without really having any time to show good-behavior.
Now it's become a matter of the public venting their general outrage and hatred towards a nonsense garbage news story because they're bitter about not being privileged too. The whole thing is disgusting.
45 days isn't too long for 2 counts of driving without a license and a DUI...
Quote from: Rule on June 08, 2007, 09:18:38 PM
Now it's become a matter of the public venting their general outrage and hatred towards a nonsense garbage news story because they're bitter about not being privileged too. The whole thing is disgusting.
I wanna be privileged. It'd be neat. :)
Quote from: Rule on June 08, 2007, 09:18:38 PM
On the other hand, the sheriff's treatment seems preferential and it was strange that her initial jail term was reduced for "good behavior" without really having any time to show good-behavior.
Kerrigan has sex with Duke.
Quote from: Blaze on June 08, 2007, 08:41:55 PM
How the hell does someone achieve "good behavior" in three days?
Fucking the judge.
It's good to see that our system corrects injustice though and really takes it to the badguys. ::)
I actually prefer her being out of jail though because then I can see pictures of her in revealing (or no) attire. :)
Quote from: Newby on June 08, 2007, 09:38:37 PM
Quote from: Rule on June 08, 2007, 09:18:38 PM
On the other hand, the sheriff's treatment seems preferential and it was strange that her initial jail term was reduced for "good behavior" without really having any time to show good-behavior.
Kerrigan has sex with Duke.
Good point.
Quote from: Rule on June 08, 2007, 09:18:38 PM
Ok, first of all, it was reduced to a 23 day sentence. That wasn't speculation. Look up "paris hilton 23 day" on google, and a number of news sources will confirm that. Second, I agree that having the sentence reduced for "good behavior" was inappropriate, but once it was done it should not be reversed.
Third, I think it's obvious why the sheriff re-assigned her.
And finally, this is an issue of someone getting special treatment because she is a celebrity and also getting unusually harsh treatment for the same reason. Her initial prison term was longer than usual, and it was extremely unprofessional to lengthen her jail term after it had been officially reduced. On the other hand, the sheriff's treatment seems preferential and it was strange that her initial jail term was reduced for "good behavior" without really having any time to show good-behavior.
Now it's become a matter of the public venting their general outrage and hatred towards a nonsense garbage news story because they're bitter about not being privileged too. The whole thing is disgusting.
I think it is completely fair to reinstate the 45 day term, if it cant be reduced for no reason it should be able to return to the original sentence for no reason (just so long as it isnt over the original). She aggravated the situation throughout the entire case and even this morning when she didn't appear for court when she was supposed to and had to be escorted by sheriffs.
Quote from: Rule on June 08, 2007, 09:18:38 PM
Ok, first of all, it was reduced to a 23 day sentence. That wasn't speculation. Look up "paris hilton 23 day" on google, and a number of news sources will confirm that. Second, I agree that having the sentence reduced for "good behavior" was inappropriate, but once it was done it should not be reversed.
Third, I think it's obvious why the sheriff re-assigned her.
Actually, all the reliable news sources(CNN, Fox News, AP) I've seen indicate that her sentence was not reduced to 23 days.
Quote from: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,278885,00.html
Hilton, 26, was originally sentenced to 45 days in jail for violating probation in an alcohol-related reckless driving case, but had been expected to serve 23 days because of state rules allowing shorter sentences for good behavior.
I also found another site that indicated part of the good behavior 'rules' are actually California state law and that things like her showing up for court dates helps her. Another note of interest is that Sheriff Lee Baca supposedly received a $1,000 donation from a relative of Paris sometime last year, and hes that one that released her so everything isn't as "clean" as one might hope.
I still haven't seen anything that indicates that Paris will have to serve the full 45 days in jail now, and afterall if the good behavior rules are infact a law then the judge will not be able to override them and she'll get out after 23.
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 09, 2007, 12:00:34 AM
I think it is completely fair to reinstate the 45 day term, if it cant be reduced for no reason it should be able to return to the original sentence for no reason (just so long as it isnt over the original). She aggravated the situation throughout the entire case and even this morning when she didn't appear for court when she was supposed to and had to be escorted by sheriffs.
It's completely unfair for her sentence to be reinstated, if they let her go then that was the decision. It's not like she's some serial killer who is an increased danger to society (you could say she might kill someone by drunk driving, but she could kill someone just by driving sober..it's speculation). I think it's unprofessional for them to do this personally, and I think you're just for the reinstatement because of who she is. I bet if you or one of your friends was sentenced, then released, and then made to go back to prison you'd be singing a completely different tune.
1) she wasnt released technically, the sheriff's office let her serve the time at home
2) read zorm's post re: the time she was suppose to serve
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 09, 2007, 01:49:28 AM
1) she wasnt released technically, the sheriff's office let her serve the time at home
so...what you're saying is she was
released from prison?House arrest is a completely different level.
People are saying the law is biased because she's a celebrity, but I say the people are biased because she's a celebrity. They want to see her suffer, they laugh at it because they have a negative opinion of her already and it makes them feel as if she's a regular person like them.
technically released from prison, but not from her sentence...she was just transfered. I suppose transfered is a more appropriate word