News:

Who uses forums anymore?

Main Menu

Paris Hilton

Started by CrAz3D, June 08, 2007, 06:58:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

CrAz3D

Sentenced to 45 days for DUI on suspended license.
Speculation said 23 w/good behavior.

After 3 days she was released for "medical reasons" but today the judge said "NO FUCKING WAY you dumbass sheriffs (I hope that they get held in contempt), that bitch is in the slammer for the full 45 now, PWN!"

Picturey goodness:





ahahahahahahahahahahaha

Sidoh

#1
LOL.

On a similar note, Sarah Silverman apparently pissed her off pretty badly:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjBt_C1cg8c

Hahaha.

Edit: It seems that viacom claimed copyright infringement on the last one, but it seems the same guy reposted it.  I changed the link.

Warrior

One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

Newby

I hope she gets assraped by Big Bubba. It'll be fucking awesome.

Hell, I'll go commit a crime up in L.A. and go to jail with her, and fuck her ass myself.

... I don't think I've got the girth to fit in her ass though. :|
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 AM
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

CrAz3D

still, she'll be in a special cell

Rule

#5
She shouldn't have been placed under house arrest after the "medical" excuse, but her sentence should not have been moved back to 45: since it was changed to 23 (which I didn't agree with) and she started her jail time on that sentence, it should have stayed that way when the judge ordered her back - to do anything else is just vindictive, not fair or just.



CrAz3D

As I understood, 23 was just speculation taking into account "good behavior" time

Blaze

How the hell does someone achieve "good behavior" in three days?
And like a fool I believed myself, and thought I was somebody else...

Sidoh

Quote from: Blaze on June 08, 2007, 08:41:55 PM
How the hell does someone achieve "good behavior" in three days?

Easy.  Become a celebrity.

Haha... I'm guessing she was wallowing in self pity, screaming, crying, etc.  I'd say that there were some guards who were sympathetic toward her and claimed she was "psychologically instable" or something.

Rule

Ok, first of all, it was reduced to a 23 day sentence.  That wasn't speculation.  Look up "paris hilton 23 day" on google, and a number of news sources will confirm that.  Second, I agree that having the sentence reduced for "good behavior" was inappropriate, but once it was done it should not be reversed
Third, I think it's obvious why the sheriff re-assigned her.

And finally, this is an issue of someone getting special treatment because she is a celebrity and also getting unusually harsh treatment for the same reason.  Her initial prison term was longer than usual, and it was extremely unprofessional to lengthen her jail term after it had been officially reduced.  On the other hand, the sheriff's treatment seems preferential and it was strange that her initial jail term was reduced for "good behavior" without really having any time to show good-behavior.

Now it's become a matter of the public venting their general outrage and hatred towards a nonsense garbage news story because they're bitter about not being privileged too.  The whole thing is disgusting.

rabbit

45 days isn't too long for 2 counts of driving without a license and a DUI...

Newby

Quote from: Rule on June 08, 2007, 09:18:38 PM
Now it's become a matter of the public venting their general outrage and hatred towards a nonsense garbage news story because they're bitter about not being privileged too.  The whole thing is disgusting.

I wanna be privileged. It'd be neat. :)

Quote from: Rule on June 08, 2007, 09:18:38 PM
On the other hand, the sheriff's treatment seems preferential and it was strange that her initial jail term was reduced for "good behavior" without really having any time to show good-behavior.

Kerrigan has sex with Duke.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 AM
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

trust

Quote from: Blaze on June 08, 2007, 08:41:55 PM
How the hell does someone achieve "good behavior" in three days?

Fucking the judge.

It's good to see that our system corrects injustice though and really takes it to the badguys.  ::)
I actually prefer her being out of jail though because then I can see pictures of her in revealing (or no) attire. :)

d&q

Quote from: Newby on June 08, 2007, 09:38:37 PM
Quote from: Rule on June 08, 2007, 09:18:38 PM
On the other hand, the sheriff's treatment seems preferential and it was strange that her initial jail term was reduced for "good behavior" without really having any time to show good-behavior.

Kerrigan has sex with Duke.

Good point.
The writ of the founders must endure.

CrAz3D

Quote from: Rule on June 08, 2007, 09:18:38 PM
Ok, first of all, it was reduced to a 23 day sentence.  That wasn't speculation.  Look up "paris hilton 23 day" on google, and a number of news sources will confirm that.  Second, I agree that having the sentence reduced for "good behavior" was inappropriate, but once it was done it should not be reversed
Third, I think it's obvious why the sheriff re-assigned her.

And finally, this is an issue of someone getting special treatment because she is a celebrity and also getting unusually harsh treatment for the same reason.  Her initial prison term was longer than usual, and it was extremely unprofessional to lengthen her jail term after it had been officially reduced.  On the other hand, the sheriff's treatment seems preferential and it was strange that her initial jail term was reduced for "good behavior" without really having any time to show good-behavior.

Now it's become a matter of the public venting their general outrage and hatred towards a nonsense garbage news story because they're bitter about not being privileged too.  The whole thing is disgusting.
I think it is completely fair to reinstate the 45 day term, if it cant be reduced for no reason it should be able to return to the original sentence for no reason (just so long as it isnt over the original).  She aggravated the situation throughout the entire case and even this morning when she didn't appear for court when she was supposed to and had to be escorted by sheriffs.