Which container do you guys recommend? MKV or AVI? I've heard MKV has better compression ratios resulting in high-quality video while being a low-space format.
Holy shit, it's Well, shit.2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024, and the US isn't a fascist country! What a time to be alive.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuoteIt can probably do it, but you probably will want a high-powered machine for it. Newer distributions have support for multithreading. You may have to do some relabeling of your data to make it graphable (e.g. write a quick script to query and make it into an x-y coordinate system). Supports Linux.
MATLAB can graph numbers if that's what you're looking to do.
Quote from: iago on August 08, 2010, 09:57:01 PMWell, SPSS is (iirc) a pay-to-use program and I can't recall how expensive it is. If you want to do statistics based on names vs. uid's, etc etc, SPSS is probably one of the easiest ways to go about it. I've used it a couple times and it has a pretty steep learning curve but that shouldn't be a problem for you. :P
Yeah, I want to simply visualize a huge series of numbers so I can see how they're laid out. Let's say they're user ids from a certain social networking site, and I'm curious how they choose user ids so we can save time when doing a full brute force. In theory. ;)
Statistics are okay, as long as it can handle 170 million lines. Linux friendliness would be nice.
QuoteMATLAB can graph numbers if that's what you're looking to do.
I'm not really familiar with MATLAB. Can it do what I need?
Quote from: Armin on August 03, 2010, 03:42:50 PMNo. She's ugly, Megan Fox is ugly, and I've never understood the big hype.
You have officially lost all clout when it comes to rating women.
Quote from: Lead on August 03, 2010, 06:46:07 AMDoesn't change the fact that, drunkard or not, Raynor's new character looks uglier than Angelina Jolie (which is saying something. good lord that woman is atrocious).Quote from: deadly7 on August 03, 2010, 01:50:03 AM
http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080730022851/starcraft/images/1/1f/JimRaynor_SC1_HeadAnim1.gif
Sure as hell looks bald-headed to me.
Which reminds me, must play SC1. So much damn fun.
Remember, this new campaign takes place (I'm assuming) a good deal of time after the Brood War ended.
Quote from: Lead on August 02, 2010, 05:20:06 AMIf she's doing things in bed worth pleading the fifth, she sounds like a keeper...
Hopefully she doesn't plead the fifth on you. Or the second for that matter.
Quote from: Joe on August 01, 2010, 12:48:17 PMI think you misunderstood. Windows install: partition X GB for NTFS and Windows boot partition. THEN Linux install: partition Y GB for ext4 & swap. THEN: wanted to take the unpartitioned space (~80GB) and format that to NTFS using Linux. Linux didn't even see the damn unpartitioned space, and once I got it to do that, it didn't let me write to the partition table no matter what I did. Windows let me write to the table... and also decided to overwrite my Slackware partition. Win.
Always install Windows first and let Linux clean up it's mess.
Quote from: Lead on July 28, 2010, 02:06:41 PM"destroyed b.net". ;)
There is no BNET. Think of a mixture of Facebook and XFire.
Quote from: rabbit on July 27, 2010, 04:43:12 PMAnd with how D3 looks it looks as though Activision is making Blizzard go graphics first and not appeal to its fanbase. SC1 was amazing because you could almost play it on what had the equivalent specs of a graphing calculator *just fine*. SC2 I may only download just for the story. It looks like they destroyed b.net from what I've heard.
Beta ran acceptably on my GeForce FX 5900. Got about 30 FPS provided I didn't hover over huge battles too long. Or play Protoss. Energy fields destroyed my FPS.
Page created in 0.031 seconds with 13 queries.