News:

How did you even find this place?

Main Menu

The Hacker Manifesto

Started by Joe, August 02, 2008, 08:53:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Joe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_Manifesto

I'm sure most of you have read it before, but I came upon it last night and it was a quick interesting read that pretty much sums it up. I'd call it the Cracker Manifesto though, but still..
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 PMI'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 PM
You might be right about that, Joe.


topaz~

You don't understand it if you think it should be the Cracker Manifesto.

while1

Quote from: topaz~ on August 02, 2008, 09:05:14 PM
You don't understand it if you think it should be the Cracker Manifesto.

Agreed.  I don't even see how you would come to the conclusion that it pertains more to a cracker...
I tend to edit my topics and replies frequently.

http://www.operationsmile.org

rabbit


Joe

Wait, fuck, I'm totally an idiot. I mixed up Hacker vs Cracker due to lack of sleep. I thought crackers were the good guys and hackers were the bad guys.

So yeah, the hacker manifesto is totally right. Sorry.

Quote from: rabbit on August 02, 2008, 10:26:21 PM
God dammit, Joe...

Nice post.
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 PMI'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 PM
You might be right about that, Joe.


while1

#5
Quote from: Joe on August 02, 2008, 10:33:30 PM
Wait, fuck, I'm totally an idiot. I mixed up Hacker vs Cracker due to lack of sleep. I thought crackers were the good guys and hackers were the bad guys.

Huh... I don't think you understand the term 'cracker'- someone who engages in cracking (software or hardware).  Sure crackers are usually thought of more of as 'bad guys', but hackers can also be 'good guys' and 'bad guys' or both.  i.e. white hat, black hat, grey hat.

My understanding of a 'cracker' is could be wrong though.

The Hacker's Manifesto doesn't necessarily pertain to a single kind of hacker, but all of them, whether black hat, white hat, or grey hat.

Being a being a bad guy or good guy has nothing to do with it.
I tend to edit my topics and replies frequently.

http://www.operationsmile.org

rabbit

The main difference is that crackers actively engage in breaking the law for the sake of breaking the law.  Hackers don't.

iago

The definitions have become all mixed up due to media attention.

But the basic definition (hackers are good guys, crackers are bad) is as accurate as it's getting. But it's hardly a meaningful distinction anymore.

Rule

I've had this discussion many times, and it's always boring, pedantic, and irritating.  I'm sick of idiots trying to elevate themselves through bullshit issues like this. (e.g. hacker vs cracker)



rabbit

Quote from: Rule on August 02, 2008, 11:02:42 PM
I've had this discussion many times, and it's always boring, pedantic, and irritating.  I'm sick of idiots trying to elevate themselves through bullshit issues like this. (e.g. hacker vs cracker)
To answer your question, yes, I am awesome.

iago

Quote from: Rule on August 02, 2008, 11:02:42 PM
I've had this discussion many times, and it's always boring, pedantic, and irritating.  I'm sick of idiots trying to elevate themselves through bullshit issues like this. (e.g. hacker vs cracker)
It may be boring and pedantic, but it's also a pretty important distinction. For example, I am most definitely a hacker, but I'm also definitely not a cracker.

I think I prefer the terms white/grey/blackhat, though. It's much clearer.

Ender

joe we still need to work on your table manners

Rule

#12
Quote from: iago on August 02, 2008, 11:08:23 PM
Quote from: Rule on August 02, 2008, 11:02:42 PM
I've had this discussion many times, and it's always boring, pedantic, and irritating.  I'm sick of idiots trying to elevate themselves through bullshit issues like this. (e.g. hacker vs cracker)
It may be boring and pedantic, but it's also a pretty important distinction. For example, I am most definitely a hacker, but I'm also definitely not a cracker.

I think I prefer the terms white/grey/blackhat, though. It's much clearer.


Insecure pseudo-intellectual jerks -- the types that thrive on IRC -- love these sorts of arguments.  It's an easy way to win a fight and assert your superiority.  It doesn't take much for the people who make a fuss to know the supposed original usages.  And the terminology is commonly used interchangeably, so the opportunity to 'catch someone out' frequently arises.  The meaning of a word like this usually derives from how it is used.  If 99.9% of people think of hacker as a general term (that would include crackers), then that is the effective definition of that word.   It's also important to be able to distinguish between being homosexual and being happy.  That doesn't mean the correct route is to chastise people who use gay to mean homosexual.

Joe

Rule, I'm not sure where the argument started here. We discussed it politely and you came in and said "man, get over yourself and quit arguing, you boring, pedantic, and irritating idiots.
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 PMI'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 PM
You might be right about that, Joe.


Rule

Quote from: Joe on August 02, 2008, 11:36:05 PM
Rule, I'm not sure where the argument started here. We discussed it politely and you came in and said "man, get over yourself and quit arguing, you boring, pedantic, and irritating idiots.

Don't misquote me.  It makes you look stupid when my post is on the same page.  Also there is no argument.