News:

Happy New Year! Yes, the current one, not a previous one; this is a new post, we swear!

Main Menu

Man arrested with rifle in Denver

Started by CrAz3D, August 26, 2008, 06:25:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

CrAz3D

<edit>I didnt like that first article either</edit>
http://www.denverpost.com/commented/ci_10292295?source=commented-politics

Interesting that he wasnt a registered guest, maybe he was about to reserve a room?  And to NOT know the DNC was in town, I find that hard to believe.

Still no reason to arrest the guy though!

iago

It certainly sounds suspicious.

I mean, from the second article. The first is just crap. :)

Warrior

was arrested for unlawful carrying of a weapon and remained in custody Sunday.
One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

CrAz3D

#3
Quote from: CrAz3D on August 26, 2008, 06:25:16 PM
http://www.denverpost.com/commented/ci_10292295?source=commented-politics

QuoteHe said he had just picked up his rifles from the Sportsman's Warehouse and had them in a locked gun case when he checked in at the Grand Hyatt. The clerk checking him in noticed the rifle case and called security.
QuoteThe general manager of the Grand Hyatt told 9News that Calanchini was not registered to stay at the hotel.


Now I'm confused .... was he checked in or wasnt he!?  This is BAD reporting, someone should've followed to find out if he was actually a guest.edit: Oops, he was being checked in, last line through me.



Warrior, it isn't illegal to carry firearms in locked cases.  They claimed it was "concealed" ... but locked in a case is not concealment.  If it is, anytime you BUY a firearm, you are illegally concealing it (unless you have a permit for a concealed weapon).  Calling a locked up weapon illegally concealed is (A) risky precedent; and (B) will be struck down in court in about three shakes of a stick.

Camel

Quote from: CrAz3D on August 26, 2008, 06:42:49 PM
Calling a locked up weapon illegally concealed is (A) risky precedent; and (B) will be struck down in court in about three shakes of a stick.

Around here, it's practically illegal to even talk about guns.

<Camel> i said what what
<Blaze> in the butt
<Camel> you want to do it in my butt?
<Blaze> in my butt
<Camel> let's do it in the butt
<Blaze> Okay!

CrAz3D

Quote from: Camel on August 27, 2008, 01:16:36 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on August 26, 2008, 06:42:49 PM
Calling a locked up weapon illegally concealed is (A) risky precedent; and (B) will be struck down in court in about three shakes of a stick.

Around here, it's practically illegal to even talk about guns.

Are you in Canadia too?

Blaze

Quote from: CrAz3D on August 27, 2008, 04:01:41 PM
Quote from: Camel on August 27, 2008, 01:16:36 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on August 26, 2008, 06:42:49 PM
Calling a locked up weapon illegally concealed is (A) risky precedent; and (B) will be struck down in court in about three shakes of a stick.

Around here, it's practically illegal to even talk about guns.

Are you in Canadia too?

No.
And like a fool I believed myself, and thought I was somebody else...

Camel

Quote from: CrAz3D on August 27, 2008, 04:01:41 PM
Quote from: Camel on August 27, 2008, 01:16:36 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on August 26, 2008, 06:42:49 PM
Calling a locked up weapon illegally concealed is (A) risky precedent; and (B) will be struck down in court in about three shakes of a stick.

Around here, it's practically illegal to even talk about guns.

Are you in Canadia too?

Boston area.

<Camel> i said what what
<Blaze> in the butt
<Camel> you want to do it in my butt?
<Blaze> in my butt
<Camel> let's do it in the butt
<Blaze> Okay!

CrAz3D

Yeah, the NE does sorta suck at somethings

leet_muffin

Yeah, I'm still fairly confused as to what law he was breaking.
The douchebag method:
Quote from: Trust on April 19, 2008, 02:58:00 AM
fuck allfo you i dont give a fuck ill fight everyone of you fuck that sbhit fuck you

CrAz3D


Camel

Quote from: CrAz3D on August 28, 2008, 12:58:57 PM
Yeah, the NE does sorta suck at somethings

Aside from my roommate, I don't know a single person IRL who is in favor of guns being legal, including myself.

I'm not saying that people shouldn't have the right to defend themselves, but c'mon - if no one has guns, than criminals and gangs won't either.

<Camel> i said what what
<Blaze> in the butt
<Camel> you want to do it in my butt?
<Blaze> in my butt
<Camel> let's do it in the butt
<Blaze> Okay!

iago

Quote from: Camel on August 28, 2008, 04:36:17 PM
I'm not saying that people shouldn't have the right to defend themselves, but c'mon - if no one has guns, than criminals and gangs won't either.
I agree -- and it's workable, too, nobody here has guns/gets shot. It's all about the stabbing here.

CrAz3D

Quote from: Camel on August 28, 2008, 04:36:17 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on August 28, 2008, 12:58:57 PM
Yeah, the NE does sorta suck at somethings

Aside from my roommate, I don't know a single person IRL who is in favor of guns being legal, including myself.

I'm not saying that people shouldn't have the right to defend themselves, but c'mon - if no one has guns, than criminals and gangs won't either.

That would mean NO one could have guns/bombs/knives/etc.  That is 100% impossible.

Warrior

Quote from: CrAz3D on August 28, 2008, 07:37:00 PM
Quote from: Camel on August 28, 2008, 04:36:17 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on August 28, 2008, 12:58:57 PM
Yeah, the NE does sorta suck at somethings

Aside from my roommate, I don't know a single person IRL who is in favor of guns being legal, including myself.

I'm not saying that people shouldn't have the right to defend themselves, but c'mon - if no one has guns, than criminals and gangs won't either.

That would mean NO one could have guns/bombs/knives/etc.  That is 100% impossible.

I think they would not be so readily availible, plus I'd like to see a chart which shows something like "Number of murders prevented due to rednecks owning guns per year".

I don't really care if people own guns, I just hate conservative morons who cry when common sense restrictions are placed (Mental health checks, criminal background checks).

The problem with guns is that there is no purpose other than to kill, and it empowers a bunch of scrawny people and those same people who believe it is their god-given right to weild an instrument of death often become the killer themselves.

One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling