News:

Help! We're trapped in the computer, and the computer is trapped in 2008! Someone call the time police!

Main Menu

Legality of posting Palin's emails

Started by iago, September 23, 2008, 11:00:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

iago

[video] http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1950

Sort of an interesting discussion, I think. Although the interviewer seemed to be pretty dense about it, although the interviewee was really patient.. :)

Sidoh


iago

I have no idea who he is, but all I know is, in that interview, he was an idiot. :)

Sidoh

#3
Quote from: iago on September 23, 2008, 12:20:38 PM
I have no idea who he is, but all I know is, in that interview, he was an idiot. :)


In every clip I've seen of him, he behaves similarly.  Here's him flipping out a long time ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tJjNVVwRCY

Another one where he fails at debate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beJ9yJpR_DA

Chavo

O'Reilly's definition of a debate is interrupting and yelling over anyone that disagrees with them.

iago

This thread wasn't supposed to be about O'Reilly, I didn't even know who he was. More about the idea of posting illegally obtained information. Apparently, if you legally obtain information that was obtained illegally, it's still ok to post it. Obviously, that's the premise behind Wikileaks. I had no idea it worked like that!

But besides that, I still have to comment on the clips...
Quote from: Sidoh on September 23, 2008, 12:38:49 PM
In every clip I've seen of him, he behaves similarly.  Here's him flipping out a long time ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tJjNVVwRCY
Haha, that's crazy! He acted like a complete jerk there!

Quote from: Sidoh on September 23, 2008, 12:38:49 PM
Another one where he fails at debate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beJ9yJpR_DA
That part about taking things out of context is hilarious, and completely flipped what he was saying. That's so funny! :)

Seems like he just repeats the same things and talks down them, in that clip, assuming things like he'd never read that book. Somebody has to say this: CrAz3d? Is that you? :)

Warrior

O'Reilly thinks loud means right. Theres a clip of like a highschooler owning him on YouTube.
One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

Sidoh

Quote from: Warrior on September 23, 2008, 05:47:05 PM
O'Reilly thinks loud means right. Theres a clip of like a highschooler owning him on YouTube.

Haha, yeah.  I think that's the second one I linked.  It annoys me that he's still on the air.

iago

Quote from: Warrior on September 23, 2008, 05:47:05 PM
O'Reilly thinks loud means right. Theres a clip of like a highschooler owning him on YouTube.
It was an amazing video. The student should be proud! :)

Warrior

Ah, I didn't even see your second link :O.
One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

Blaze

Quote from: Warrior on September 23, 2008, 05:47:05 PM
O'Reilly thinks loud means right. Theres a clip of like a highschooler owning him on YouTube.

"Bart, your mother makes a very loud point."
And like a fool I believed myself, and thought I was somebody else...

Camel

Quote from: iago on September 23, 2008, 02:02:37 PM
Seems like he just repeats the same things and talks down them, in that clip, assuming things like he'd never read that book.

I think O'Reilly was insinuating that the kid was on drugs.

<Camel> i said what what
<Blaze> in the butt
<Camel> you want to do it in my butt?
<Blaze> in my butt
<Camel> let's do it in the butt
<Blaze> Okay!

topaz~


iago

So, allegedly in retaliation for O'Reilly's attack on Wikileaks, some folks attacked his site and got access to the admin panel, which was apparently unprotected (except by a private URL). This admin panel listed the passwords of 205 users of the site, in cleartext.

Naturally, the story was posted to wikileaks, along with a screenshot as proof of the hack.

Anybody want to congratulate O'Reilly for painting a Bull's Eye on his head?

Hitmen

Quote from: iago on September 24, 2008, 09:57:43 AM
So, allegedly in retaliation for O'Reilly's attack on Wikileaks, some folks attacked his site and got access to the admin panel, which was apparently unprotected (except by a private URL). This admin panel listed the passwords of 205 users of the site, in cleartext.

Naturally, the story was posted to wikileaks, along with a screenshot as proof of the hack.

Anybody want to congratulate O'Reilly for painting a Bull's Eye on his head?

Wow, it stores people's passwords in plain text, and *displays* them for admins? That is pretty retarded to start with.
Quote
(22:15:39) Newby: it hurts to swallow