Pretty crazy that we're closer to 2030, than we are 2005. Where did the time go!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: truste1 on April 20, 2009, 08:59:54 pmQuote from: Warrior on April 20, 2009, 08:39:29 pmCutting Pork (A republican suggestion) and cutting the budget (the President's suggestion) are both very very small savings in spending relative to the size of the Federal Budget, but Republicans only criticize one of the two approaches.That's my point. Cutting both are good. I'm just pointing out hypocrisy.I don't think Republicans are criticizing the general idea of budget cuts. lol.They downplay the efforts based on the argument that it's small compared to the size of the overall Budget, yet they cry endlessly about Pork barrel spending which..also is small in size compared to the overall Budget.Quote from: truste1 on April 20, 2009, 08:59:54 pm@CrAz3D: The best way to avoid complaints of bias is to use news sources with a liberal bias, obviously. NPR is a good choice.Liberal bias is also known as reality.
Quote from: Warrior on April 20, 2009, 08:39:29 pmCutting Pork (A republican suggestion) and cutting the budget (the President's suggestion) are both very very small savings in spending relative to the size of the Federal Budget, but Republicans only criticize one of the two approaches.That's my point. Cutting both are good. I'm just pointing out hypocrisy.I don't think Republicans are criticizing the general idea of budget cuts. lol.
Cutting Pork (A republican suggestion) and cutting the budget (the President's suggestion) are both very very small savings in spending relative to the size of the Federal Budget, but Republicans only criticize one of the two approaches.That's my point. Cutting both are good. I'm just pointing out hypocrisy.
@CrAz3D: The best way to avoid complaints of bias is to use news sources with a liberal bias, obviously. NPR is a good choice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWt8hTayupEVisual representation of the budget cuts.
Quote from: Warrior on April 20, 2009, 09:05:55 pmQuote from: truste1 on April 20, 2009, 08:59:54 pmQuote from: Warrior on April 20, 2009, 08:39:29 pmCutting Pork (A republican suggestion) and cutting the budget (the President's suggestion) are both very very small savings in spending relative to the size of the Federal Budget, but Republicans only criticize one of the two approaches.That's my point. Cutting both are good. I'm just pointing out hypocrisy.I don't think Republicans are criticizing the general idea of budget cuts. lol.They downplay the efforts based on the argument that it's small compared to the size of the overall Budget, yet they cry endlessly about Pork barrel spending which..also is small in size compared to the overall Budget.Quote from: truste1 on April 20, 2009, 08:59:54 pm@CrAz3D: The best way to avoid complaints of bias is to use news sources with a liberal bias, obviously. NPR is a good choice.Liberal bias is also known as reality.
They downplay the efforts based on the argument that it's small compared to the size of the overall Budget, yet they cry endlessly about Pork barrel spending which..also is small in size compared to the overall Budget.
Quote from: Warrior on April 20, 2009, 09:05:55 pmThey downplay the efforts based on the argument that it's small compared to the size of the overall Budget, yet they cry endlessly about Pork barrel spending which..also is small in size compared to the overall Budget.Pork can be lots of WASTEFUL (key term) spending though
Agreed. We could cut a lot more in addition to the pork barrel. Like welfare.
