Author Topic: Lets try again.  (Read 14805 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #30 on: December 13, 2005, 10:08:52 pm »
No, a little after.

Whoever voted no or abstained, I'd apreciate it if you contacted me.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #31 on: December 13, 2005, 10:15:32 pm »
No, a little after.

Whoever voted no or abstained, I'd apreciate it if you contacted me.

Personally, Joe, I think that's a pretty stupid request.  I think they only way you're going to regain members' respect is submissively, through your "global" actions, not by your personal persuasion.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #32 on: December 13, 2005, 10:18:54 pm »
No, a little after.

Whoever voted no or abstained, I'd apreciate it if you contacted me.

Personally, Joe, I think that's a pretty stupid request.  I think they only way you're going to regain members' respect is submissively, through your "global" actions, not by your personal persuasion.

Unless there are certain members (I can name one, but won't) who voted no because he never talks to Joe.  I think Joe's response here might have an effect on him (or her!)

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #33 on: December 14, 2005, 01:26:09 am »
No, a little after.

Whoever voted no or abstained, I'd apreciate it if you contacted me.

Personally, Joe, I think that's a pretty stupid request.  I think they only way you're going to regain members' respect is submissively, through your "global" actions, not by your personal persuasion.

Unless there are certain members (I can name one, but won't) who voted no because he never talks to Joe.  I think Joe's response here might have an effect on him (or her!)
We don't have any women in the clan because Newby keeps asking them to sex him up whenever they even think about LOOKING at our website.
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline deadly7

  • 42
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6496
    • View Profile
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #34 on: December 14, 2005, 08:36:52 pm »
We have a woman, you dolt. iago! (check profile)

@Joe: I abstained. gg~
[17:42:21.609] <Ergot> Kutsuju you're girlfrieds pussy must be a 403 error for you
 [17:42:25.585] <Ergot> FORBIDDEN

on IRC playing T&T++
<iago> He is unarmed
<Hitmen> he has no arms?!

on AIM with a drunk mythix:
(00:50:05) Mythix: Deadly
(00:50:11) Mythix: I'm going to fuck that red dot out of your head.
(00:50:15) Mythix: with my nine

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #35 on: December 14, 2005, 08:40:20 pm »
We have a woman, you dolt. iago! (check profile)

@Joe: I abstained. gg~

She may not be a member of x86, but Kaleeko's female. :P

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #36 on: December 14, 2005, 10:33:43 pm »
We don't have any women in the clan because Newby keeps asking them to sex him up whenever they even think about LOOKING at our website.

Next time I fly to Arizona I'm burning your house down and/or shooting your family. >:( >:D
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #37 on: December 14, 2005, 10:35:38 pm »
Next time I fly to Arizona I'm burning your house down and/or shooting your family. >:( >:D

You're such a calm child! :D

Offline Joe

  • B&
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10319
  • In Soviet Russia, text read you!
    • View Profile
    • Github
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #38 on: December 15, 2005, 03:57:00 am »
Well, as you can see, I really want to join x86. As iago knows, I was anxious to hear the results of the vote, too. I'm kinda disapointed in myself that I couldn't get 75% of the clan to vote yes, but the 9 abstains left me very little margin of error.

I didn't want to persuade them, but to ask them why they voted the way that they did, and perhaps try to work on that aspect of my character.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests

You might be right about that, Joe.


Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10877
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #39 on: December 15, 2005, 09:32:36 am »
9 abstains? Who the hell told you your vote results?
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #40 on: December 15, 2005, 11:47:17 am »
I believe Newby told you the results, you must have gotten the order mixed up:
9 yes - 5 no - 4 abstain

I'm sure if you give it time, you'll have a chance.  It really did come down to the last couple people :)

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #41 on: December 15, 2005, 05:47:57 pm »
I believe Newby told you the results, you must have gotten the order mixed up:
9 yes - 5 no - 4 abstain

I'm sure if you give it time, you'll have a chance.  It really did come down to the last couple people :)

Still, 4 abstains leaves little margin for error.  And actually, since there are 20 members and 2 didn't vote, that's actually 6 abstains.

25% of 14 is 3.5; only 4 no's would have taken Joe out of the running at that rate of abstention.  Had everybody voted, it would have taken 6 no's.  (25% of 20 is 5, but to get in you only need 75% of the vote, so it would have taken one more no for complete elimination).
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #42 on: December 15, 2005, 06:15:38 pm »
I believe Newby told you the results, you must have gotten the order mixed up:
9 yes - 5 no - 4 abstain

I'm sure if you give it time, you'll have a chance.  It really did come down to the last couple people :)

Still, 4 abstains leaves little margin for error.  And actually, since there are 20 members and 2 didn't vote, that's actually 6 abstains.

25% of 14 is 3.5; only 4 no's would have taken Joe out of the running at that rate of abstention.  Had everybody voted, it would have taken 6 no's.  (25% of 20 is 5, but to get in you only need 75% of the vote, so it would have taken one more no for complete elimination).

All of which makes perfect sense. 

If I wanted it to be easier to join, I would have made it 66%, like vL.  Or, I wouldn't have allowed abstains, and not ended the vote until there are enough yes's or no's. 

But the way we're doing it now work perfectly ine. 

Offline MyndFyre

  • Boticulator Extraordinaire
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
  • The wait is over.
    • View Profile
    • JinxBot :: the evolution in boticulation
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #43 on: December 15, 2005, 09:36:42 pm »
All of which makes perfect sense. 

If I wanted it to be easier to join, I would have made it 66%, like vL.  Or, I wouldn't have allowed abstains, and not ended the vote until there are enough yes's or no's. 

But the way we're doing it now work perfectly ine. 

I don't think I disagreed with you....
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Our species really annoys me.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17914
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Lets try again.
« Reply #44 on: December 15, 2005, 09:44:19 pm »
All of which makes perfect sense. 

If I wanted it to be easier to join, I would have made it 66%, like vL.  Or, I wouldn't have allowed abstains, and not ended the vote until there are enough yes's or no's. 

But the way we're doing it now work perfectly ine. 

I don't think I disagreed with you....

Ah, it sounded like there was some subtext regarding abstains being an issue, since we privately discussed it recently :)

I guess it was an explanation, not a complaint. 

Complaint (against you) withdrawn.