Author Topic: Wikipedia Hoax  (Read 1054 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Newby

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10875
  • Thrash!
    • View Profile
Wikipedia Hoax
« on: December 11, 2005, 12:19:56 PM »
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/11/1536222

Hahahaha. That's illegal, because... ?
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote
[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17668
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Wikipedia Hoax
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2005, 12:24:51 PM »
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/11/1536222

Hahahaha. That's illegal, because... ?

Lmao, I just read that.  It was on slashdot's RSS Atom feed which displays on Gmail.

It's against there guidelines for posting/editing articles.  There's some information here.

Offline Blaze

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7126
  • Canadian
    • View Profile
    • Maide
Re: Wikipedia Hoax
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2005, 12:26:23 PM »
Its funny though... like undictionary or something like that...
And like a fool I believed myself, and thought I was somebody else...

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17928
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Wikipedia Hoax
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2005, 12:26:53 PM »
You mean a Wikipedia article may not *sarcastic gasp* be accurate?

I used to subscribe to Slashdot's RSS feed that displays on Firefox.  My technology owns you. :-P

And by the way, breaking guidelines isn't illegal. 

Offline rabbit

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8097
  • I speak for the entire clan (except Joe)
    • View Profile
Re: Wikipedia Hoax
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2005, 12:28:44 PM »
It was libel, which is illegal.

Offline iago

  • Leader
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17928
  • Fnord.
    • View Profile
    • SkullSecurity
Re: Wikipedia Hoax
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2005, 12:30:58 PM »
I was responding to Sidoh. 

But according to a reply on Slashdot, there's a law protecting them from slander/libel/whatever.

Offline Sidoh

  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17668
  • MHNATY ~~~~~
    • View Profile
    • sidoh
Re: Wikipedia Hoax
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2005, 12:36:26 PM »
You mean a Wikipedia article may not *sarcastic gasp* be accurate?

I used to subscribe to Slashdot's RSS feed that displays on Firefox.  My technology owns you. :-P

And by the way, breaking guidelines isn't illegal. 

Haha.  It's still against them, damnit!  >:(

Offline Ergot

  • 吴立峰 ^_^ !
  • x86
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
  • I steal bandwidth. p_o
    • View Profile
Re: Wikipedia Hoax
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2005, 12:46:11 PM »
You mean a Wikipedia article may not *sarcastic gasp* be accurate?

I used to subscribe to Slashdot's RSS feed that displays on Firefox.  My technology owns you. :-P

And by the way, breaking guidelines isn't illegal. 
Mine is in my Live-Bookmarks toolbar gg :)
Who gives a damn? I fuck sheep all the time.
And yes, male both ends.  There are a couple lesbians that need a two-ended dildo...My router just refuses to wear a strap-on.
(05:55:03) JoE ThE oDD: omfg good job i got a boner thinkin bout them chinese bitches
(17:54:15) Sidoh: I love cosmetology