Facebook killed the radio star. And by radio star, I mean the premise of distributed forums around the internet. And that got got by Instagram/SnapChat. And that got got by TikTok. Where the fuck is the internet we once knew?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Even then its stills not really cracking. I.E. Even if you protect both strings I can just overwrite parts of your program to make it execute code to print joe sucks, there is plenty room.
I'd personally do as Joe suggests
You might be right about that, Joe.
I think the correct term is one whole, but eh.Or what you could have done is just calculated the SHA256 hash of "Joe sucks", and replaced the other one in there. That's what I would have done.
The point of cracking a program is to make it work. Why would I do something to the program the author told me to if I could get the same results with 50 times less work?
Because most crack me's and such are designed to show off a specific method only. Of course real application author's are going to use a combination of methods and be much more concerned about a totally secure program.
Quote from: zorm on January 18, 2006, 09:54:38 pmBecause most crack me's and such are designed to show off a specific method only. Of course real application author's are going to use a combination of methods and be much more concerned about a totally secure program.He didn't say anything about a specific method, he just said get it done. That's what rabbit did.
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there
Our species really annoys me.
I didn't mean to, Myndfyre.
The way it was solved was the proper way to do it. The idea of being a hacker is to think outside the box, and to use unexpected solutions. I can give many examples, but I don't feel like it. I don't think anybody here is arguing that the proposed solution was wrong, Joe only said it's not what he intended. So it's all good.
[ box ] |-< <--- You