News:

Happy New Year! Yes, the current one, not a previous one; this is a new post, we swear!

Main Menu

Re: Welcome CrAz3D to x86!

Started by Joe, April 27, 2006, 08:15:37 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Joe

April 27, 2006, 08:15:37 AM
You are worthy! You are worthy! Lord of Lords, King of Kings, you are worthy!
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 PMI'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 PM
You might be right about that, Joe.

Newby

#1
April 27, 2006, 10:08:37 PM
What a useless post. But I don't see why it was trashed... he was simply congratulating GameSnake...
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 AM
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

iago

#2
April 28, 2006, 12:07:46 AM
Quote from: Newby on April 27, 2006, 10:08:37 PM
What a useless post. But I don't see why it was trashed... he was simply congratulating GameSnake...
I was thinking the same thing.  *shrug*

Sidoh

#3
April 28, 2006, 08:31:57 PM
I trashed it.  It's a quote from the bible; it has nothing to do with congratulating CrAz3D (not GameSnake -- unless I'm mistaken).

Newby

#4
April 28, 2006, 09:08:49 PM
Quote from: Sidoh on April 28, 2006, 08:31:57 PM
I trashed it.  It's a quote from the bible; it has nothing to do with congratulating CrAz3D (not GameSnake -- unless I'm mistaken).

Quote from: GameSnake on April 27, 2006, 02:23:30 AM
Welcome to the clan CrAz3D! You are worthy! You are worthy!

He was simply building off of that. :/
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 AM
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Sidoh

#5
April 28, 2006, 09:09:57 PM
Quote from: Newby on April 28, 2006, 09:08:49 PM
He was simply building off of that. :/

He malformed it into religious innuendo. :P

iago

#6
April 29, 2006, 02:04:10 AM
Quote from: Sidoh on April 28, 2006, 09:09:57 PM
Quote from: Newby on April 28, 2006, 09:08:49 PM
He was simply building off of that. :/

He malformed it into religious innuendo. :P

He picked up a quotation and continued with it. 

Sidoh

#7
April 29, 2006, 03:48:11 AM
Quote from: iago on April 29, 2006, 02:04:10 AM
He picked up a quotation and continued with it. 

Yes, because the lyrics from "Michael W. Smith -  You Are Holy (Prince Of Peace)" clearly have absolutely no religious value.  It had absolutely nothing to do with religion and had no chance to stir controversy among some of our more atheist members.

</sarcasm>

I fail to see any useful addition contained in this post.  I did, however, see potential for controversy.  To me, that seems like more than enough reason to trash a single post... :P

iago

#8
April 29, 2006, 05:40:26 PM
Quote from: Sidoh on April 29, 2006, 03:48:11 AM
Quote from: iago on April 29, 2006, 02:04:10 AM
He picked up a quotation and continued with it. 

Yes, because the lyrics from "Michael W. Smith -  You Are Holy (Prince Of Peace)" clearly have absolutely no religious value.  It had absolutely nothing to do with religion and had no chance to stir controversy among some of our more atheist members.

</sarcasm>

I fail to see any useful addition contained in this post.  I did, however, see potential for controversy.  To me, that seems like more than enough reason to trash a single post... :P
That's odd, you're normally one of the biggest sources of causing controversy.. :P

Sidoh

#9
April 29, 2006, 10:30:17 PM
Quote from: iago on April 29, 2006, 05:40:26 PM
That's odd, you're normally one of the biggest sources of causing controversy.. :P

Yes, but it's generally out of reasonable trains of thought.  I disagree.  I don't constantly post flamebait.

Plus, they're on different subjects.  Joe consistantly posts things about Christianity...
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions