News:

Happy New Year! Yes, the current one, not a previous one; this is a new post, we swear!

Main Menu

Punishing the Innocent

Started by Newby, July 19, 2006, 10:37:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

What do you think?

better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer
5 (62.5%)
better that ten innocent persons suffer than that one guilty escape
3 (37.5%)

Total Members Voted: 8

Newby

I'm curious as to what people think and why. Please explain the logic behind your choice.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 AM
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

leet_muffin

Actually, the poll is a bit extreme, but if it were something in the range of 1:1, Id be more supportive. Also, it depends upon the crime\consequences. If its something to the effect of life in prison, no. Thats just alot of confusion, though. Ill stick with the old "innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" ways.
The douchebag method:
Quote from: Trust on April 19, 2008, 02:58:00 AM
fuck allfo you i dont give a fuck ill fight everyone of you fuck that sbhit fuck you

MyndFyre

Kill them all.  The innocent people were probably stupid and/or shitty drivers.
Quote from: Joe on January 23, 2011, 11:47:54 PM
I have a programming folder, and I have nothing of value there

Running with Code has a new home!

Quote from: Rule on May 26, 2009, 02:02:12 PMOur species really annoys me.

d&q

The first option definitely. The American legal system works that way too.
The writ of the founders must endure.

leet_muffin

Quote from: Deuce on July 19, 2006, 10:44:36 PM
The first option definitely. The American legal system works that way too.

Notice how many criminals we have on the loose? Sex offenders not reporting\living in areas they should not be? Cool.
The douchebag method:
Quote from: Trust on April 19, 2008, 02:58:00 AM
fuck allfo you i dont give a fuck ill fight everyone of you fuck that sbhit fuck you

d&q

Notice how many innocent people are let to live their lives instead of rotting in jail? Cool.
The writ of the founders must endure.

Newby

Quote from: leet_muffin on July 19, 2006, 10:42:25 PM
the poll is a bit extreme

See: blackstone's formulation.

I say the second option. The planet is overpopulated as it is, and I'd rather kill everything including the innocent to make sure that no one else has to suffer. If ten innocent people die for every 1 guilty person, that's one less guilty person who could have made those ten, if not hundreds or thousands more, suffer.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 AM
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

iago

The problem is that everybody here is innocent.  Anybody who picks 'b' has to accept the possibility that they're going to be punished. 

CrAz3D

A

no innocent person should be punished...but for people proved guilty beyond any reasonable doubt(which could include DNA evidence, eye witnesses, & confessions), death be to them (for some offenses)

GameSnake

How would 10 innocent people suffer if 1 person can't escape?!

AntiVirus

Quote from: Newby on July 19, 2006, 11:01:44 PM
Quote from: leet_muffin on July 19, 2006, 10:42:25 PM
the poll is a bit extreme

See: blackstone's formulation.

I say the second option. The planet is overpopulated as it is, and I'd rather kill everything including the innocent to make sure that no one else has to suffer. If ten innocent people die for every 1 guilty person, that's one less guilty person who could have made those ten, if not hundreds or thousands more, suffer.
The only thing I see wrong with what you said is that you say the planet is overpopulated, but do you really think that killing these innocent will make it any less overpopulated?  For each one of those that die hundreds more are born. It doesn't do much to the grand total.  Kind of a bad reason to support it. :P
The once grove of splendor,
Aforetime crowned by lilac and lily,
Lay now forevermore slender;
And all winds that liven
Silhouette a lone existence;
A leafless oak grasping at eternity.


"They say that I must learn to kill before I can feel safe, but I rather kill myself then turn into their slave."
- The Rasmus

Rule

#11
Quote from: iago on July 20, 2006, 12:45:53 AM
The problem is that everybody here is innocent. 

Interesting assumption >:D

Guilty of what?  What kind of suffering are we talking about?  I think you need to be more specific.

iago

Quote from: Rule on July 20, 2006, 02:58:01 AM
Quote from: iago on July 20, 2006, 12:45:53 AM
The problem is that everybody here is innocent. 

Interesting assumption >:D
Well, the assumption was important to creating the proper emotional response :P

Quote from: Rule on July 20, 2006, 02:58:01 AM
Guilty of what?  What kind of suffering are we talking about?  I think you need to be more specific.
That's a good point, but I think that, the way it's worded, we have to apply it to everything.  Start with murder, and work your way down to parking tickets. 

Chavo

Quote from: MyndFyrex86] link=topic=6761.msg82959#msg82959 date=1153363372]
Kill them all.  The innocent people were probably stupid and/or shitty drivers.
Or framed.   Real world examples of both options are obvious today.  The american system represents A (albeit somewhat corrupt I'll admit) while China's 'no chance to defend yourself' policies represent B.  I think any system that trys to use fear (excepting fear of reprisal) is flawed.

Newby

Quote from: iago on July 20, 2006, 09:22:46 AM
That's a good point, but I think that, the way it's worded, we have to apply it to everything.  Start with murder, and work your way down to parking tickets. 

Correct.

Quote from: unTactical on July 20, 2006, 09:56:36 AM
I think any system that trys to use fear (excepting fear of reprisal) is flawed.

We had to read 1984 in our English class. We had to do a project where we decided what ten aspects of life we would control if we took over a government. I said (rather, my group) the first choice would be the armed forces, because ruling through violence will keep the masses in line, and a violent reign of power generates fear in the masses. You don't rule them through this fear, you rule them through punishment and keep them in line. Fear implies you won't do anything bad to them, they just run their lives on fear.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 AM
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT.