News:

Help! We're trapped in the computer, and the computer is trapped in 2008! Someone call the time police!

Main Menu

PETA against cockroach eating contest

Started by CrAz3D, September 25, 2006, 01:03:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

CrAz3D


Sidoh

That's so stupid.  I wonder if they're against eliminating foul infected with the avian flu?

iago

Quote from: Sidoh on September 25, 2006, 01:59:59 PM
That's so stupid.  I wonder if they're against eliminating foul infected with the avian flu?
I'm absolutely sure that they ARE against killing those foul, as well as against killing cows with BSE (mad cow disease).  Because after all, they're all animals, and PETA is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

I may not like PETA, but I totally understand why they'd take this position. 

AntiVirus

People
Eatting
Tasty
Animals.


I fucking hate PETA people.  Especially this women.  Who the fuck cares?!  You don't see them protesting against Lions for eatting animals do you?  What's so different between a human eatting an animal/bug and a Lion eatting an animal.  Atleast when we do it isn't as messy and the animal dies quicker.
The once grove of splendor,
Aforetime crowned by lilac and lily,
Lay now forevermore slender;
And all winds that liven
Silhouette a lone existence;
A leafless oak grasping at eternity.


"They say that I must learn to kill before I can feel safe, but I rather kill myself then turn into their slave."
- The Rasmus

Sidoh

Quote from: iago on September 25, 2006, 02:12:40 PM
I'm absolutely sure that they ARE against killing those foul, as well as against killing cows with BSE (mad cow disease).  Because after all, they're all animals, and PETA is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

I may not like PETA, but I totally understand why they'd take this position. 

Then what do they recommend we do?  Lock them up in a cage, quarantined from the outside world?  That's not very ethical either.  It doesn't seem that they can think past five minutes in the future.

iago

Quote from: Sidoh on September 25, 2006, 02:39:52 PM
Then what do they recommend we do?  Lock them up in a cage, quarantined from the outside world?  That's not very ethical either.  It doesn't seem that they can think past five minutes in the future.
Why are you asking me?  I don't know!

Sidoh

Quote from: iago on September 25, 2006, 03:03:06 PM
Why are you asking me?  I don't know!

But you said you can see why they take the stance they do! :(

Haha, I see reason for being against that, but there are far too many reasons to outlaw it, I think.

iago

Quote from: Sidoh on September 25, 2006, 05:12:35 PM
Quote from: iago on September 25, 2006, 03:03:06 PM
Why are you asking me?  I don't know!

But you said you can see why they take the stance they do! :(

Haha, I see reason for being against that, but there are far too many reasons to outlaw it, I think.

I do see why, killing the birds isn't very nice.  But I don't know what they'd choose for an alternative, and I'm neither going to research their viewpoints, nor am I going to pretend I know :P

Sidoh

Quote from: iago on September 25, 2006, 05:16:51 PM
I do see why, killing the birds isn't very nice.  But I don't know what they'd choose for an alternative, and I'm neither going to research their viewpoints, nor am I going to pretend I know :P

Haha.  That's what I'm saying.  I'd be interested to hear what the propose that people do as an alternative (I'm not asking you :P).  They say killing disease-ridden birds is mean, but there really isn't much of an ethical solution as of now that doesn't also entail high amounts of danger to humans.

Personally, I think most of PETA's viewpoints are dumbass hasty statements.

Rule

Quote from: Sidoh on September 25, 2006, 05:20:25 PM
Quote from: iago on September 25, 2006, 05:16:51 PM
I do see why, killing the birds isn't very nice.  But I don't know what they'd choose for an alternative, and I'm neither going to research their viewpoints, nor am I going to pretend I know :P

Haha.  That's what I'm saying.  I'd be interested to hear what the propose that people do as an alternative (I'm not asking you :P).  They say killing disease-ridden birds is mean, but there really isn't much of an ethical solution as of now that doesn't also entail high amounts of danger to humans.

Personally, I think most of PETA's viewpoints are dumbass hasty statements.

So if a group of humans got an infectious disease that was 50% likely to be fatal, would you prefer that those humans be killed, or quarantined?

Super_X

Quote from: Rule on September 25, 2006, 08:23:49 PM
Quote from: Sidoh on September 25, 2006, 05:20:25 PM
Quote from: iago on September 25, 2006, 05:16:51 PM
I do see why, killing the birds isn't very nice.  But I don't know what they'd choose for an alternative, and I'm neither going to research their viewpoints, nor am I going to pretend I know :P

Haha.  That's what I'm saying.  I'd be interested to hear what the propose that people do as an alternative (I'm not asking you :P).  They say killing disease-ridden birds is mean, but there really isn't much of an ethical solution as of now that doesn't also entail high amounts of danger to humans.

Personally, I think most of PETA's viewpoints are dumbass hasty statements.

So if a group of humans got an infectious disease that was 50% likely to be fatal, would you prefer that those humans be killed, or quarantined?

Leper colonys.

CrAz3D

Quote from: Rule on September 25, 2006, 08:23:49 PM
Quote from: Sidoh on September 25, 2006, 05:20:25 PM
Quote from: iago on September 25, 2006, 05:16:51 PM
I do see why, killing the birds isn't very nice.  But I don't know what they'd choose for an alternative, and I'm neither going to research their viewpoints, nor am I going to pretend I know :P

Haha.  That's what I'm saying.  I'd be interested to hear what the propose that people do as an alternative (I'm not asking you :P).  They say killing disease-ridden birds is mean, but there really isn't much of an ethical solution as of now that doesn't also entail high amounts of danger to humans.

Personally, I think most of PETA's viewpoints are dumbass hasty statements.

So if a group of humans got an infectious disease that was 50% likely to be fatal, would you prefer that those humans be killed, or quarantined?

We obviously have more & higher rights than animals.  We're the dominate species on earth, we make the rules.

Sidoh

Quote from: Rule on September 25, 2006, 08:23:49 PM
So if a group of humans got an infectious disease that was 50% likely to be fatal, would you prefer that those humans be killed, or quarantined?

Quarantined, assuming it is contageous.

Newby

Quote from: AntiVirus on September 25, 2006, 02:36:34 PM
People
Eatting
Tasty
Animals

No wonder they're against this. Cockroaches do not taste good. If this were a cow eating contest with A1 steak sauce I'm sure they'd approve.
- Newby
http://www.x86labs.org

Quote[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote from: Rule on June 30, 2008, 01:13:20 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 30, 2008, 10:38:22 AM
I'd bet that you're currently bloated like a water ballon on a hot summer's day.

That analogy doesn't even make sense.  Why would a water balloon be especially bloated on a hot summer's day? For your sake, I hope there wasn't too much logic testing on your LSAT. 

Joe

Quote from: Rule on September 25, 2006, 08:23:49 PM
Quote from: Sidoh on September 25, 2006, 05:20:25 PM
Quote from: iago on September 25, 2006, 05:16:51 PM
I do see why, killing the birds isn't very nice.  But I don't know what they'd choose for an alternative, and I'm neither going to research their viewpoints, nor am I going to pretend I know :P

Haha.  That's what I'm saying.  I'd be interested to hear what the propose that people do as an alternative (I'm not asking you :P).  They say killing disease-ridden birds is mean, but there really isn't much of an ethical solution as of now that doesn't also entail high amounts of danger to humans.

Personally, I think most of PETA's viewpoints are dumbass hasty statements.

So if a group of humans got an infectious disease that was 50% likely to be fatal, would you prefer that those humans be killed, or quarantined?


A leper should be quarantined. Someone with the avian flu should be asked not to bite others.

EDIT -
This reminds me of a local outbreak of Whooping Cough, recently. The victims of Whooping Cough were quarintined to their homes officially.
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 PMI'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 PM
You might be right about that, Joe.