Starcraft & Winamp

[abc]

Which means risking Warden crap.

You're risking it, definitely, but if you aren't writing to Starcraft's processes/DLLs you're probably ok. Probably. :)

ya, I've read a little bit about it but I don't really get it :P

Like that tutorial I wrote for you? :P

Oh don't get me wrong, I understood and did intake many parts of what you wrote of that tutorial :) I'm appreciated it a lot :)

[iago]

Why risk it if there's no need?  If he does the gateway scheme, like I suggested, he can forge whisper packets as responses to his commands.

Depends what he wants to do. He said in a previous post that this isn't about winamp, it's something else he's curious about.

[rabbit]

I still say false whispering is easiest.  You'll be able to print to the screen and not risk Warden.

[Camel]

Warden is binary code that the client runs. It can detect absolutely anything. The assumption is that it won't consider printing to the screen a hack.

I just have a winamp-enabled battle.net bot running and on my friends list, then I can just /f m play songname

[Hitmen]

Warden is binary code that the client runs. It can detect absolutely anything. The assumption is that it won't consider printing to the screen a hack.

I just have a winamp-enabled battle.net bot running and on my friends list, then I can just /f m play songname

I hope you have no one else on your friends list. that would be a good way to get yourself ignored easy from me :)

[Blaze]

Warden is binary code that the client runs. It can detect absolutely anything. The assumption is that it won't consider printing to the screen a hack.

I just have a winamp-enabled battle.net bot running and on my friends list, then I can just /f m play songname

I hope you have no one else on your friends list. that would be a good way to get yourself ignored easy from me :)

<BNU-Camel> play YMCA
^ What I get alllll night.  :(

[warz]

Kind of offtopic from this, but not too far but. It's been awhile since I've read about the Starcraft InGame drawing on screen, anyone here successfully accomplish it?

Nobody here, as far as I know.

Of course, I very easily could, but I never tried.

this is really easy. in fact, writing to the screen was always the first function i'd mess with, when writing hacks. i used to do this all the time for various hacks. it's very easy once you find the function, which is easy enough to find also.

as per to the winamp thing - i made on awhile ago, but i'm sure it doesn't work anymore. it was part of my starcraft chat modification hack thing, might be on http://rafm.org/. just injected code to handle specified /commands, and then execute my own linked libraries. very simple hack to make.

[Camel]

I hope you have no one else on your friends list. that would be a good way to get yourself ignored easy from me :)

Actually, I haven't used that method in years. I do occasionally use /f m to send commands to my ops bot, but when you consider that it's running on a computer that has no sound card, and is physically in another state, using it to control winamp seems pretty silly.

I use global hotkeys to control winamp; alt+ctrl+arrow keys.