Slashdot or Digg?

[while1]

Alright, I have to go with Slashdot because the Digg community as a whole is pretty bad- I'd rate it only a couple of levels above YouTube.

For insightfulness, funniness, and informativeness of its community, Slashdot has me.  Plus their feeds aren't filled with crap I don't care about.  Less is more sometimes.

[deadly7]

Alright, I have to go with Slashdot because the Digg community as a whole is pretty bad- I'd rate it only a couple of levels above YouTube.

For insightfulness, funniness, and informativeness of its community, Slashdot has me.  Plus their feeds aren't filled with crap I don't care about.  Less is more sometimes.

Both are cesspools as it stands right now. I only visit Slashdot because it has a few articles I might not otherwise see.. digg, on the other hand, is useless. Myspace4nerds.

[iago]

I like Slashdot myself. I find the stories are generally better written, I can know what the article is all about in 20 seconds, and can decide whether or not I care.

[Warrior]

Digg, much more entertaining and less rabid fanboy posts. Plus I'm way into the election and half the front page articles are pro-Obama.

[Falcon]

I visit both.

[AnonymousCoward]

I do believe that you entirely know my stance upon this issue.

[while1]

Digg, much more entertaining and less rabid fanboy posts. Plus I'm way into the election and half the front page articles are pro-Obama.

While you have a point with your first sentence, it totally is negated by your second sentence which only proves you're a hypocrite because it implies that you like Digg because its community is full of a bunch of Obama fanboys.

[warz]

obama is a crazy fucking whack job.

[Warrior]

Digg, much more entertaining and less rabid fanboy posts. Plus I'm way into the election and half the front page articles are pro-Obama.

While you have a point with your first sentence, it totally is negated by your second sentence which only proves you're a hypocrite because it implies that you like Digg because its community is full of a bunch of Obama fanboys.

Is there even a such thing as a Hillary/McCain fanboy..? Look at their demographics, I don't think they'd have articles up regardless.
Plus, Digg is user submitted and user voted on content. There's a difference between that, and content regularly posted and known to have a specific slant towards a set of ideals.

It's perfectly possible for Hillary or McCain "fanboys"(Again, do they even exist?) to get front paged. It's kind of hard to be biased all by yourself.

[Warrior]

obama is a crazy fucking whack job.

much better than shitlery "obliterate iran" clinton or McBush

[iago]

I do believe that you entirely know my stance upon this issue.

I'm impressed at A/C using a proxy and not revealing his ip!

Who wants to play the "who was this?" guessing game?

[Joe]

I think he's Cory Feldman. Whoever that is.

[Blaze]

I think he's Cory Feldman. Whoever that is.

Google pulled up http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000397/ but I doubt it.  :P

[Joe]

I bet it's iago. He would pick a vegetarian.

EDIT -
I SPELLED VEGETARIAN WRONG.

[warz]

NEITHER!