News:

So the widespread use of emojis these days kinda makes forum smileys pointless, yeah?

Main Menu

Bank robbery foiled by man packing heat

Started by CrAz3D, June 17, 2008, 08:31:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

rabbit

#1
June 17, 2008, 08:36:40 PM
Lesson of the day: Equip your bomb with a dead man's handle!

while1

#3
June 17, 2008, 10:08:36 PM
And those damn liberals want to make it harder for us honest citizens to exercise our 2nd amendment right... pfft.
I tend to edit my topics and replies frequently.

http://www.operationsmile.org

CrAz3D

#4
June 17, 2008, 11:56:52 PM
Quote from: rabbit on June 17, 2008, 08:36:40 PM
Lesson of the day: Equip your bomb with a dead man's handle!
Dead man's handle?  Uhm, ok.


Anyway, GUNS FTW!  Much like LAKERS FTL

rabbit

#5
June 18, 2008, 05:54:06 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 17, 2008, 11:56:52 PM
Quote from: rabbit on June 17, 2008, 08:36:40 PM
Lesson of the day: Equip your bomb with a dead man's handle!
Dead man's handle?  Uhm, ok.


Anyway, GUNS FTW!  Much like LAKERS FTL
Yeah, it's this.  It means that you activate the bomb, then if you release the button it explodes, ie: if you get shot.

CrAz3D

#6
June 18, 2008, 05:57:35 PM
Oh,k.  OR equip yourself with a bomb in the first place

iago

#7
June 18, 2008, 06:38:58 PM
I don't want to get pulled into an argument about weapons, but......

Wow, the guy with the gun is totally insane. If he had shot the guy, the bomb could so easily have been triggered, either by a dead man's switch, the twitch of a hand, a badly aimed shot, impact with the ground, a bullet hitting the bomb itself, etc. That would have killed all kinds of innocent people.

He got lucky that the guy cooperated, but what he did was incredibly irresponsible. I mean, what's more important, the innocent lives of the people in the bank, or the bank's money?

CrAz3D

#8
June 18, 2008, 06:44:20 PM
Whats the likelihood the dude HAD a bomb? 

Also, army dude ... I don't think he'd really miss.

iago

#9
June 18, 2008, 06:51:40 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 18, 2008, 06:44:20 PM
Whats the likelihood the dude HAD a bomb? 
If he didn't have a bomb, what difference does it make that the guy had a gun? He could have just been tackled.

Quote from: CrAz3D on June 18, 2008, 06:44:20 PM
Also, army dude ... I don't think he'd really miss.
Did you read my list of potential reasons for the bomb to go off? "Miss" wasn't any of them, the cloest was "badly aimed shot", by which I meant hitting him in a place that didn't kill him instantly.

Warrior

#10
June 18, 2008, 06:58:19 PM
Quote from: Michael on June 17, 2008, 10:08:36 PM
And those damn liberals want to make it harder for us honest citizens to exercise our 2nd amendment right... pfft.

iago hit the nail right on the head: Bank money is much less valuable than innocent lives.

Either way, making it harder for a citizen to get a firearm is not a bad thing. Things like criminal / mental background checks seem perfectly reasonable to me.

One must ask oneself: "do I will trolling to become a universal law?" And then when one realizes "yes, I do will it to be such," one feels completely justified.
-- from Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Trolling

CrAz3D

#11
June 19, 2008, 01:20:36 AM
Quote from: iago on June 18, 2008, 06:51:40 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 18, 2008, 06:44:20 PM
Whats the likelihood the dude HAD a bomb? 
If he didn't have a bomb, what difference does it make that the guy had a gun? He could have just been tackled.

Quote from: CrAz3D on June 18, 2008, 06:44:20 PM
Also, army dude ... I don't think he'd really miss.
Did you read my list of potential reasons for the bomb to go off? "Miss" wasn't any of them, the cloest was "badly aimed shot", by which I meant hitting him in a place that didn't kill him instantly.



Cause shooting stupid people that rob banks cleanses society

iago

#12
June 19, 2008, 08:18:05 AM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 19, 2008, 01:20:36 AM
Quote from: iago on June 18, 2008, 06:51:40 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on June 18, 2008, 06:44:20 PM
Whats the likelihood the dude HAD a bomb? 
If he didn't have a bomb, what difference does it make that the guy had a gun? He could have just been tackled.

Quote from: CrAz3D on June 18, 2008, 06:44:20 PM
Also, army dude ... I don't think he'd really miss.
Did you read my list of potential reasons for the bomb to go off? "Miss" wasn't any of them, the cloest was "badly aimed shot", by which I meant hitting him in a place that didn't kill him instantly.



Cause shooting stupid people that rob banks cleanses society
Yet again, that has nothing to do with what I said.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions