Official "post your desktop" thread!

[Sidoh]

Almost everyone here seems to be slightly biased towards OSX... Whats the problem with it? Last time I checked, Apple was delaying 10.5 because they wanted to make sure it is ready for release before they release it.

You can't say that much for Vista...

Except that you can.  I'm pretty sure that Vista was delayed a few times.  Good intentions aren't equivalent to good results.

[l)a-Sniper]

Right. Microsoft intended to fix Vista by delaying it, but that did shit.


10.5 will be a hell of a lot better then Vista will ever hope to be when it comes out.

[Newby]

10.5 will be a hell of a lot better then Vista will ever hope to be when it comes out.

Glad Apple has to set goals to beat. Microsoft is the leader of the industry. :)

[Kaleeko]

10.5 will be a hell of a lot better then Vista will ever hope to be when it comes out.

Glad Apple has to set goals to beat. Microsoft is the leader of the industry. :)

::)

[BigAznDaddy]

Glad Apple has to set goals to beat. Microsoft is the leader of the industry. :)

goals aren't always met

[Newby]

Right. Microsoft intended to fix Vista by delaying it, but that did shit.


10.5 will be a hell of a lot better then Vista will ever hope to be when it comes out.

1. What's wrong with Vista? I've experienced no flaws with the OS in of itself...

2. You're right, because the user base will be 1/100000th of that of Windows, so real flaws won't be brought out as often. ;)

[Chavo]

Almost everyone here seems to be slightly biased towards OSX... Whats the problem with it? Last time I checked, Apple was delaying 10.5 because they wanted to make sure it is ready for release before they release it.

You can't say that much for Vista...

Quick EDIT:
Yes, I know about key programmers being pulled off, but accourding to Apple, 10.5 is ready, they just want to make sure first, and thats a bit harder without the key programmers.

Right. Microsoft intended to fix Vista by delaying it, but that did shit.


10.5 will be a hell of a lot better then Vista will ever hope to be when it comes out.

::)
*yawn* at close-minded OS biases

[Sidoh]

::)
*yawn* at close-minded OS biases

Amen.

[Newby]

::)
*yawn* at close-minded OS biases

Amen.

But you see, he only picked out the OS X zealots. :)

[Chavo]

Believe me, it wasn't on purpose.  Those were just the first 2 I saw.

[deadly7]

But you see, he only picked out the OS X zealots. :)

That's because Warrior hasn't posted, duh.

[BigAznDaddy]

[l)a-Sniper]

::)
*yawn* at close-minded OS biases

Amen.

If I was close-minded I would have never even gave Linux a chance. I don't only use OS X, I use Ubuntu too.

[Warrior]

Shut up. You run from every single argument you get in with me Sniper. I've proven you time and time again to be nothing more than a hopeless Mac loser.

Mac and Vista were delayed for the same reasons. You can't bash one and defend the other. Get off of Jobs' dick for a second and open your eyes man.

Vista was delayed because it didn't have the overall performance and quality that Microsoft wanted it to have when it launched.

Mac was delayed for the same reason, the difference is that Mac is much more secretive with Leopard's development so there is nothing to criticize them on until a release. You can't gauge how severely needed or how useless a delay would be. That's the only difference, in every other aspect what Microsoft did with Vista is identical to what Apple is doing with Leopard.

You're obviously closed minded, whenever someone even mentions Vista(or Zune for that matter) you go Apeshit(Appleshit?) and call it <Insert half-assed flame here>.  Then, you show that you obviously have no idea what you're talking about and in the end pretend you don't see the thread anymore.

Don't you have a WDDC press release or Mac rumor to be wanking it to?

[l)a-Sniper]

But you see, he only picked out the OS X zealots. :)

That's because Warrior hasn't posted, duh.

There ya go. ^^