News:

So the widespread use of emojis these days kinda makes forum smileys pointless, yeah?

Main Menu

You're evil!

Started by Ergot, May 24, 2006, 12:11:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

iago

Ah, I didn't know you could do (x|).  Cool!

Joe

That also includes gvi and xvi.
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 PMI'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 PM
You might be right about that, Joe.


rabbit


Joe

It is possible to have g and not m, isn't it?
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 PMI'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 PM
You might be right about that, Joe.


rabbit

You suck at regular expressions.

Joe

Yeah, I do, hence the "isn't it?".
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 PMI'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 PM
You might be right about that, Joe.


Blaze

And like a fool I believed myself, and thought I was somebody else...

Joe

You suck at regex, Blaze. "*" is not a wildcard, therefore it'd only pick up things like "blaze*sucks*at*regexs" which have a * in them.

You mean "".
Quote from: Camel on June 09, 2009, 04:12:23 PMI'd personally do as Joe suggests

Quote from: AntiVirus on October 19, 2010, 02:36:52 PM
You might be right about that, Joe.


rabbit

* is a 0 or more quantifier, so "joe suck(s*|z*)" would match "joe suck", "joe sucks", "joe suckz", "joe suckssssss", "joe suckzzzzzzzz" or anything of that sort.

iago

Quote from: Joe on May 27, 2006, 03:15:09 PM
That also includes gvi and xvi.
Ah, that's true.  Doing a proper regex would have to completely separate vi from all the rest, I think. 

Perhaps: (vi|(g|x|)im)

Rule

Another fairly well known Richard Stallman quote:

Quote
Why GNU `su' does not support the `wheel' group
===============================================

   (This section is by Richard Stallman.)

   Sometimes a few of the users try to hold total power over all the
rest.  For example, in 1984, a few users at the MIT AI lab decided to
seize power by changing the operator password on the Twenex system and
keeping it secret from everyone else.  (I was able to thwart this coup
and give power back to the users by patching the kernel, but I wouldn't
know how to do that in Unix.)

   However, occasionally the rulers do tell someone.  Under the usual
`su' mechanism, once someone learns the root password who sympathizes
with the ordinary users, he or she can tell the rest.  The "wheel
group" feature would make this impossible, and thus cement the power of
the rulers.

   I'm on the side of the masses, not that of the rulers.  If you are
used to supporting the bosses and sysadmins in whatever they do, you
might find this idea strange at first.

Quote from: older slackware man pages
       This program does not support a "wheel group" that restricts who can su
       to super-user accounts, because that can help fascist  system  adminis-
       trators hold unwarranted power over other users.

iago

Quote from: Rule on May 28, 2006, 05:14:03 PM
Quote from: older slackware man pages
       This program does not support a "wheel group" that restricts who can su
       to super-user accounts, because that can help fascist  system  adminis-
       trators hold unwarranted power over other users.

That almost sounds like a joke.  Hard to say, though.  I like it, anyways :)

Sidoh

Hahaha.  I wouldn't be too surprised if that's a real quote, but I'm not sure.