Messages

31

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 31, 2008, 11:35:06 am »

You should stick to one class and play it, Sidoh. You really don't get an actual feel for a class till 40+. That's when they really start to shine so I've heard.

32

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 29, 2008, 07:01:44 am »

I like to come back to my roots every once and a while. Nothing wrong with that. Regardless of how immature I was, it's still fun to check up on what everyone's doing.

"was" is past tense

Yep, it is.

33

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 28, 2008, 09:34:09 pm »

I like to come back to my roots every once and a while. Nothing wrong with that. Regardless of how immature I was, it's still fun to check up on what everyone's doing.

34

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 28, 2008, 05:46:43 pm »

1. Says you.
2. That's...not...funny. Sorry.

I found it rather hilarious, you see I knew from your first response to me you'd respond in a heated manner. You took the bait quite nicely, I'm only interested in having a discussion with warz, think of the chart as me politely brushing you off.

WoW doesn't exactly have a lot of instance content if you actually use your head and think about it. Since Naxx there has been nothing new as far as boss fights go, but I wouldn't expect you to understand that seeing as though you've never been into Naxx. Much less attuned for it.

Haha, is this your way of striking back? I give you pure genius (Actually not really, I recycled this same troll from Joe -- but whatever I don't feel like coming up with new content for someone who posts here maybe once a year), and you respond with "you have not seen the same pixels I have seen".

Well played. Well not really, but after all the insults I thought a compliment of sorts was in order.

Come on, let's be realistic: You're trying to justify your spending of money on a game which will  be remembered in history as "just another MMORPG".
It's pretty cute though, so by all means go on.

Why would I be heated? You're the one who's raged over the whole subject. I win either way you look at it because you're arguing with me over this.

I could honestly care less if WoW somehow were better than AoC, but from my experience (and I have a lot of it when it comes to WoW, seeing as I started playing back in like 1.3), AoC is better. However, it did take me till I got banned from WoW to realize this, but hey, better late than never.

experience does not equal the amount of time you've been at something.

for example you're like ten or eleven years  old, yet i've met five year olds with more common sense than you
so that alone invalidates your argument

you should leave now

Umm, I was "ten or eleven" somewhere around six years ago. Common sense has nothing to do with anything we're talking about here, stay on topic.

Krazed, unless your computer is somewhere along the lines of god like, don't try AoC. If you think it can handle it though I'd recommend giving it a go.

lol, how about from now on you let warz do the arguing. you're really bad.

"this has nothing to do with common sense"
you must have no friends

More than you'd imagine, actually.

But that's also besides the point, fact is, AoC is amazing. I know an entire guild from Thrall server that the majority of them are selling their accounts and playing AoC for. Don't criticize a game you've never even played before.

lol you try really hard to sound dumb

the fruits of your labor are ripe

You're such an lol terribad troll. Seriously, go to the myg0t forums if you want some competition.

35

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 28, 2008, 04:13:43 pm »

1. Says you.
2. That's...not...funny. Sorry.

I found it rather hilarious, you see I knew from your first response to me you'd respond in a heated manner. You took the bait quite nicely, I'm only interested in having a discussion with warz, think of the chart as me politely brushing you off.

WoW doesn't exactly have a lot of instance content if you actually use your head and think about it. Since Naxx there has been nothing new as far as boss fights go, but I wouldn't expect you to understand that seeing as though you've never been into Naxx. Much less attuned for it.

Haha, is this your way of striking back? I give you pure genius (Actually not really, I recycled this same troll from Joe -- but whatever I don't feel like coming up with new content for someone who posts here maybe once a year), and you respond with "you have not seen the same pixels I have seen".

Well played. Well not really, but after all the insults I thought a compliment of sorts was in order.

Come on, let's be realistic: You're trying to justify your spending of money on a game which will  be remembered in history as "just another MMORPG".
It's pretty cute though, so by all means go on.

Why would I be heated? You're the one who's raged over the whole subject. I win either way you look at it because you're arguing with me over this.

I could honestly care less if WoW somehow were better than AoC, but from my experience (and I have a lot of it when it comes to WoW, seeing as I started playing back in like 1.3), AoC is better. However, it did take me till I got banned from WoW to realize this, but hey, better late than never.

experience does not equal the amount of time you've been at something.

for example you're like ten or eleven years  old, yet i've met five year olds with more common sense than you
so that alone invalidates your argument

you should leave now

Umm, I was "ten or eleven" somewhere around six years ago. Common sense has nothing to do with anything we're talking about here, stay on topic.

Krazed, unless your computer is somewhere along the lines of god like, don't try AoC. If you think it can handle it though I'd recommend giving it a go.

lol, how about from now on you let warz do the arguing. you're really bad.

"this has nothing to do with common sense"
you must have no friends

More than you'd imagine, actually.

But that's also besides the point, fact is, AoC is amazing. I know an entire guild from Thrall server that the majority of them are selling their accounts and playing AoC for. Don't criticize a game you've never even played before.

36

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 27, 2008, 05:47:25 pm »

lol, yeah the shield system is pretty awesome but in the heat of battle I don't have time to be holding control and double tapping a w or d constantly. So I just leave my shield evenly balanced.

37

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 27, 2008, 05:10:31 pm »

Oh. And eww @ Gaysurge.

LCIRC is where it's at.

38

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 27, 2008, 05:05:26 pm »

lol, how are you playing? Server's aren't even up yet.

39

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 27, 2008, 03:42:04 pm »

1. Says you.
2. That's...not...funny. Sorry.

I found it rather hilarious, you see I knew from your first response to me you'd respond in a heated manner. You took the bait quite nicely, I'm only interested in having a discussion with warz, think of the chart as me politely brushing you off.

WoW doesn't exactly have a lot of instance content if you actually use your head and think about it. Since Naxx there has been nothing new as far as boss fights go, but I wouldn't expect you to understand that seeing as though you've never been into Naxx. Much less attuned for it.

Haha, is this your way of striking back? I give you pure genius (Actually not really, I recycled this same troll from Joe -- but whatever I don't feel like coming up with new content for someone who posts here maybe once a year), and you respond with "you have not seen the same pixels I have seen".

Well played. Well not really, but after all the insults I thought a compliment of sorts was in order.

Come on, let's be realistic: You're trying to justify your spending of money on a game which will  be remembered in history as "just another MMORPG".
It's pretty cute though, so by all means go on.

Why would I be heated? You're the one who's raged over the whole subject. I win either way you look at it because you're arguing with me over this.

I could honestly care less if WoW somehow were better than AoC, but from my experience (and I have a lot of it when it comes to WoW, seeing as I started playing back in like 1.3), AoC is better. However, it did take me till I got banned from WoW to realize this, but hey, better late than never.

experience does not equal the amount of time you've been at something.

for example you're like ten or eleven years  old, yet i've met five year olds with more common sense than you
so that alone invalidates your argument

you should leave now

Umm, I was "ten or eleven" somewhere around six years ago. Common sense has nothing to do with anything we're talking about here, stay on topic.

Krazed, unless your computer is somewhere along the lines of god like, don't try AoC. If you think it can handle it though I'd recommend giving it a go.

40

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 26, 2008, 10:37:50 pm »

1. Says you.
2. That's...not...funny. Sorry.

I found it rather hilarious, you see I knew from your first response to me you'd respond in a heated manner. You took the bait quite nicely, I'm only interested in having a discussion with warz, think of the chart as me politely brushing you off.

WoW doesn't exactly have a lot of instance content if you actually use your head and think about it. Since Naxx there has been nothing new as far as boss fights go, but I wouldn't expect you to understand that seeing as though you've never been into Naxx. Much less attuned for it.

Haha, is this your way of striking back? I give you pure genius (Actually not really, I recycled this same troll from Joe -- but whatever I don't feel like coming up with new content for someone who posts here maybe once a year), and you respond with "you have not seen the same pixels I have seen".

Well played. Well not really, but after all the insults I thought a compliment of sorts was in order.

Come on, let's be realistic: You're trying to justify your spending of money on a game which will  be remembered in history as "just another MMORPG".
It's pretty cute though, so by all means go on.

Why would I be heated? You're the one who's raged over the whole subject. I win either way you look at it because you're arguing with me over this.

I could honestly care less if WoW somehow were better than AoC, but from my experience (and I have a lot of it when it comes to WoW, seeing as I started playing back in like 1.3), AoC is better. However, it did take me till I got banned from WoW to realize this, but hey, better late than never.

41

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 26, 2008, 08:48:11 pm »

Wrath of the Lich King. Age of Conan will be a distant memory by then.

What does WoTLK have that AoC doesn't already?

about 9.5 million people

Yeah, disregard the fact that that's spread out across the entire world. Content wise however it has nothing.

ps you're wrong

just to prove how wrong you are I did a survey:

(5:13:00 PM) Warrior: so WOTLK.. great expansion or greatest expansion
(5:13:10 PM) Medon (WoW): greatest.

100% of the people I asked agree with me. 0% agree with you.

1. Says you.
2. That's...not...funny. Sorry.

WoW doesn't exactly have a lot of instance content if you actually use your head and think about it. Since Naxx there has been nothing new as far as boss fights go, but I wouldn't expect you to understand that seeing as though you've never been into Naxx. Much less attuned for it.

Also, as far as "stale" content goes, the raids in AoC actually keep you moving, it's not "hey lets sit around for 10 minutes between each pull waiting for health to regen". You're CONSTANTLY pulling mobs, and constantly fighting something. There's no time to go "afk" for a few minutes to take a shit.

Blaze: Guild Wars and AoC are nothing a like, I have them both, trust me.

42

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 26, 2008, 01:55:45 pm »

Wrath of the Lich King. Age of Conan will be a distant memory by then.

What does WoTLK have that AoC doesn't already?

about 9.5 million people

Yeah, disregard the fact that that's spread out across the entire world. Content wise however it has nothing.

43

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 26, 2008, 10:03:35 am »

Wrath of the Lich King. Age of Conan will be a distant memory by then.

What does WoTLK have that AoC doesn't already?

44

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 26, 2008, 09:22:10 am »

I'd definitely say AoC, Sidoh. I was actually going to AIM you about it a few days ago telling you to get it. Sucks that all of us will probably end up playing on different servers though. 

Anyway, yeah. Besides a HUGE number of bugs, AoC > WoW by a long shot.

45

Gaming / Re: age of conan

« on: May 25, 2008, 03:40:28 pm »

AoC is amazing, after I get hit by the WoW banwave of 08 (along with 375k other people?) I moved over to this yesterday. Level 16 Assassin on US PVP-Sourge.

Name's Screenor.

What level are you, warz?