300

[Armin]

The closest IMAX theater to me is about and hour or 2 away. :-/

[Sidoh]

Wow, this movie was extraordinary.  I'll agree with deadly in saying its easily one of the best movies that I have ever seen.  I saw it with my parents which made it a little awkward, that didn't keep me from enjoying it!

[Super_X]

I'm going to go see it in a few hours! ;D

You'll love it!

Cool!! Me too!
I'm going to see it again at 7 tonight! (one hour)

It was a good movie.. but I don't know if it's worth seeing twice in a normal theater.  The theater I went to (juts to reiterate :P) had speakers on very loud.  Every time the armies marched you could FEEL the bass vibrate the theater.  It was freaking awesome, but it kinda makes your head hurt.  Also, the video was.. all right.  Good audio definitely helped, though.  Either see it in IMAX or save your money, IMO. (obviously it's redundant to say this since you've already left.. but I felt like responding).

I went with a friend that hadn't seen it yet. It was still good the second time, but not as amazing. Although, I did get a chance to watch it for some more weird error things, and stuff, I enjoy that.

One thing I noticed was when Leonidus' friend's son had his head cut off by the dude on the horse, where does the horse and the rider go? (possible spoilers. What ever. Better safe than sorry, right?)

And also it gave me time to think and compair between movies. Like you were compairing it between LOTR and saying this is better. I agree, but I don't think that it's better cinematography. I mean, they greenscreened a lot of that, were as LOTR went out and found a set to film it on, and had the variables of many things. So, I think that that's got this beat in that sence. But, still better.

[deadly7]

The closest IMAX theater to me is about and hour or 2 away. :-/

Yeah, it's about a 45 minute drive for me.  Add in the fact that there was about half an hour of delays and stuff that day and it was bad.

Wow, this movie was extraordinary.  I'll agree with deadly in saying its easily one of the best movies that I have ever seen.  I saw it with my parents which made it a little awkward, that didn't keep me from enjoying it!

I'm sure the sex scenes were very uncomfortable...

I went with a friend that hadn't seen it yet. It was still good the second time, but not as amazing. Although, I did get a chance to watch it for some more weird error things, and stuff, I enjoy that.

One thing I noticed was when Leonidus' friend's son had his head cut off by the dude on the horse, where does the horse and the rider go? (possible spoilers. What ever. Better safe than sorry, right?)

And also it gave me time to think and compair between movies. Like you were compairing it between LOTR and saying this is better. I agree, but I don't think that it's better cinematography. I mean, they greenscreened a lot of that, were as LOTR went out and found a set to film it on, and had the variables of many things. So, I think that that's got this beat in that sence. But, still better.

I imagined it would be enjoyable, but obviously not as breathtaking.  I'm wondering what the experience would be like going from regular movie theater to IMAX, though.

In answer to that question, I believe that Leonidas' friend kills him.  If I remember correctly, he breaks ranks and goes out there and avenges his son and then brings the body back.

Yeah.  It would be hard to film something like this on location, in my opinion.  Some of the scenes are very do-able, yes, but others are just impossible.  Lord of the Rings was different because Tolkien had at least provided some pictures of what he thought it should look like.  Other than the rather poor descriptions of the battle site, I'm not sure if the makers of 300 had much more to go on.  Sure, they were following Frank Miller's graphic novel, but the movie wasn't just his comic book, per say.  Also, Lord of the Rings had a MUCH larger budget than this movie did, which basically meant more set designers, more costumer designers, better graphics people (a lot of the graphics were integrated into the movie so that it took a keen eye to differentiate between graphics/real movie).  Also, Lord of the Rings was a whole story that encompassed years (the actual story, not filming time or anything) so it would be easier to build off that than off of one battle that lasted a few months.

[Towelie]

Wow, this movie was extraordinary.  I'll agree with deadly in saying its easily one of the best movies that I have ever seen.  I saw it with my parents which made it a little awkward, that didn't keep me from enjoying it!

I'm sure the sex scenes were very uncomfortable...

I saw it with my dad, and they sure did... lol. That is one of the best movies I have seen in a while.

[Hitmen]

Uhh, this was a good movie to pass time. I'm really not seeing what all the hype is about, but it's definately worth a watch, especially if you don't have to pay for it. I do have one question though:  Why is half the movie in slow motion?

[deadly7]

Uhh, this was a good movie to pass time. I'm really not seeing what all the hype is about, but it's definately worth a watch, especially if you don't have to pay for it. I do have one question though:  Why is half the movie in slow motion?

Visual effects.  It allows for a cooler fight sequence if part of it turns into slow-mo as someone's being stabbed or what have you.

[Hitmen]

Visual effects.  It allows for a cooler fight sequence if part of it turns into slow-mo as someone's being stabbed or what have you.

That is a much more literal answer than I was looking for.

[Newby]

Uhh, this was a good movie to pass time. I'm really not seeing what all the hype is about, but it's definately worth a watch, especially if you don't have to pay for it. I do have one question though:  Why is half the movie in slow motion?

Finally! A review where the author didn't achieve an orgasm while writing about it.

[Super_X]

Uhh, this was a good movie to pass time. I'm really not seeing what all the hype is about, but it's definately worth a watch, especially if you don't have to pay for it. I do have one question though:  Why is half the movie in slow motion?

The dirrector and cinematographer said (I saw it on T.V.; it must be true!) that "[He] think[ s  ] that people who would have been so highly trained would have had time seem like it was slowing down when engaged in combat."

Also, then they can film less and have it take longer. :)

[dark_drake]

I just watched it, and I cannot count it as one of the best movies I've seen.  It's really slightly above average in my book.

[BigAznDaddy]

I just watched it, and I cannot count it as one of the best movies I've seen.  It's really slightly above average in my book.

its really good fight wise. i loved how all of them banded together with the shield stuff O man  :o. but acting wise and story line wise wasn't very good.
Spoiler...............
...............
............................
....................................
.........................................
.............................................
...........................................
..........................................
...................................
..............................
........................
....................
..............
........
....
The King guy didn't even die i mean come on.. They were in their shield hut and the main guy took off all hist stuff for one shot then woosh....
O and is the guy with one eye the narrator guy?

[dark_drake]

There's no doubt that the fights kicked ass, acting was passable, but the rest was iffy.

There were a few things that did annoy me.  For example, there were a few parts of dialog that just didn't feel right (ie., Leonidas: Spartans! Enjoy your breakfast, for tonight we dine in Hell!). Also, I just hated the artistic style of the movie; it was way too washed out for me. Before everyone says, "But dark_drake, it's based on a comic book/graphic novel," I remind you that so was Spiderman and X-Men (Yes, I realize that they're 2 completely different types of stories. I just wanted to demonstrate that just because it's based on a comic doesn't mean it has to be washed out).

[Sidoh]

The King guy didn't even die i mean come on.. They were in their shield hut and the main guy took off all hist stuff for one shot then woosh....
O and is the guy with one eye the narrator guy?

Xerxes?  I think that was their attempt to be historically accurate.  That wasn't their aim, but making something that profoundly incorrect would completely spoil the movie for anyone who knew the real story.  Leonidas said earlier in the movie "[...] And before this battle is over, they will know that even a God King can bleed."  He did exactly that.

Leonidas: Spartans! Enjoy your breakfast, for tonight we dine in Hell

I think you might find this page amusing.

[deadly7]

I think you might find this page amusing.

ROFL.  So fucking hilarious.  Great way to start the day. :P